[Steely Tom]

The report was released Monday, nearly one year after then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, under congressional questioning over the nature of the attack, shouted at lawmakers: “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

If the GOP had the brains of a typical candidate for student council at a suburban high school, they would make that sentence into Hillary Clinton's campaign slogan.

But they don't. So what's the use talking about it.

[Delta 21]

Ya think !??!

[tractorman]

Whatever happened to the video excuse?

[TigersEye]

9/27/12

Bombshell: Obama Administration Deleted State Dept. Memo From Internet After Discovering Al-Qaeda

Yesterday there were reports that the Obama Administration found out that Al-Qaeda was behind the Benghazi consulate attacks within 24 hours of the assault that killed four Americans.

So what was their first action? Did they secure the compound? – No, that took over a week to get FBI agents to the consulate Did they acknowledge it was an Al-Qaeda attack? No, Obama this week blamed the terror attack on a YouTube protest.

Here’s what they did – They scrubbed a damning State Department memo from the internet– On Wednesday September 12, 2012 blogger Speak With Authority discovered that five days before 9-11, the US State Department sent out a memo announcing no credible security threats against the United States on the anniversary of 9-11.

[Baynative]

When Hillary and Barack diverted the plane bringing the bodies of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith and former U.S. Navy SEALS Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods back to Dover AFB for a media event, she looked their parents in the eye, held their hand and lied about the attack being caused by a YouTube video.

...and there are people wanting her to be president of this [once proud] nation.

[PieterCasparzen]

Senate report: Benghazi attackers tied to Al Qaeda new world order groups

[Mark17]

A comprehensive report by the Senate Intelligence Committee definitively declared that individuals tied to Al Qaeda groups were involved in the Benghazi attack.

What was their first clue?

[TwelveOfTwenty]

The sad part is, Americans are tired of the WOT and want to be left alone to collect their free abortions, free birth control, EBT goodies, free cell phones, and anything else the government will buy their votes with.

Our troops are among the finest we've ever produced, but unlike their WWII counterparts were betrayed by the home front that was more concerned about getting their freebies than finishing off some group who attacked us 13 years ago while Bush was President.

I hate to say it, but this generation couldn't have won WWII.

[what's up]

I wonder if the NYT story was intended to preempt this report. A Dem senator probably tipped them off that the report would place blame on Madame Hillary's State Dept.

BTW...I thought the NYT story was intended to be the first in a series of six about Benghazi. Haven't seen hide nor hair of any more of them since the first one got blasted by the slain families, the CIA who were on the ground in Libya, and conservative media.

[eeriegeno]

WDDIM

[P.O.E.]

Al Qaeda’s on the run, on the rise, what’s the difference?