Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John W

How can the rate drop when fewer than expected jobs are being created?

More funny math.


2 posted on 01/10/2014 5:44:28 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red in Blue PA

More people off the UE system not being counted.


5 posted on 01/10/2014 5:45:37 AM PST by CommieCutter ("For an idea to be too simplistic, it must first be proven wrong" --Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Just arbitrarily reduce the denominator until you get the stats you want.

PS Chocolate rations will be increased to 15 grams per week.


6 posted on 01/10/2014 5:46:04 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA
How can the rate drop when fewer than expected jobs are being created?

Because more people have given up looking for work and when they do that they are no longer counted as being unemployed. If they gave the rate for people of working age who aren't working the numbers would be a lot different.

10 posted on 01/10/2014 5:48:15 AM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

The unemployment rate is a ratio. The denominator is the number of persons in the labor pool. The denominator is slipping faster than the numerator which is the number of new unemployed.

The labor pool is shrinking because people have given up or are underemployed and are working multiple jobs. Persons who take a second or third job are not reducing the number of unemployed.

When the underemployed and frustrated are factored in, the unemployment rate is well over 16%.

Personally I know people that are still waiting to bounce back from 2009. In the next 5 to 6 years I don’t think they will ever have the opportunity.

I have heard from several young people that they have taken second and third jobs. Although they are naturally upbeat at their young age they are increasingly frustrated. They’re also bright enough to know that dramatic increases in the minimum wage will result in losing a job or two.

Under Obama the USA is in decline largely because of his policies.


31 posted on 01/10/2014 6:07:07 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Because more people are hoping in the wagon then pulling it.


41 posted on 01/10/2014 6:20:50 AM PST by Kozak ("Send them back your fierce defiance! Stamp upon the cursed alliance! To arms, to arms in Dixie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Obamanomics is working! Spectacularly, even.


52 posted on 01/10/2014 7:00:05 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Yes, we can;-?


75 posted on 01/10/2014 7:58:38 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

The denominator in this ratio is the only number that’s real.


119 posted on 01/11/2014 6:16:29 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA
Not funny math at all. Consider X, the number of jobs that need to be created to,for example, maintain the unemployment rate after considering all other factors. Also consider E, the expected number of jobs created. X is independent of E. X=X, no matter if X<E, X=E, or X>E.
125 posted on 01/12/2014 6:55:25 AM PST by Darth Reardon (Is it any wonder I'm not the president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson