Watched and hung on every word.
The more you see reality, the more his words ring true.
Especially, with backs to the wall, having to BYPASS these turkeys like he writes and speaks about...
I think Levin is missing something critical. Something I don’t have the talent to articulate very well. I’ll try to explain it. First, the Liberty Amendments are a great idea, when dealing with a government who doesn’t already wield absolute power. Their sinews run throughout government. Any gains made through this process will be minimized or annulled by judges, congress, presidents, the EPA, the IRS, or any combination of cynical organizations. Second, the people of America, the Lowinfos, will undue what’s accomplished through continuing to vote for people who will dissolve our liberty. Third, Its success is uncertain. We’ll have to win elections, hearts, and minds, and hope we can hold those we’ve elected accountable. Our liberty has already been stripped by the system we’re trying to utilize to gain it back. This is folly. If we can’t win elections, hearts, and minds, are we to give up on liberty?
I’m fore the state convention process and attempting to amend the constitution, but when (not if) that fails, nullification and the resulting CWII should. Nullification, though perhaps unconstitutional (I would argue it is constitutional) at least recognizes that our constitution has been breached by the feds. Our founders understood that acts of tyranny were grounds for forceful self defense.
State nullification recognizes that the Union is broken and it’s foolish to pretend it isn’t.