Neal Boortz is a rude, arrogant putz. I’ve never listened to talk radio much, but his show was one that I went out of my way not to listen to. His retirement was a welcome one. It’s just a shame that he chose libertarianism as his philosophy to espouse. While I’m not a libertarian I think that libertarians deserved a far better spokesman than Neal Boortz.
As for his beliefs on social issues, I would simply note that nature abhors a vacuum. It’s not a question of whether morality will be legislated, it’s a question of whose morality (or lack thereof).
Notice the date. John Adams and the other Founders had an opportunity to see the horrifying violent result of the French Revolution, perpetuated by atheists.
thanks for the post!
very quotable
However, I’m going to have to return to reading FR
in lynx, until *my* morality governs the ads on e.g.
American Thinker.