Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise me or Republicanprofessor.
Looks like Hillary and Bill are up to their old tricks.
The Times should know. They were there in the bathroom. At the time Libya was suffering a toilet paper shortage.
I hope a lot of people start singing like birds all at once and settles this once and for all.
Let me see. Who am I going to believe? Do I believe the special operators on the ground there the night of the attack or the likes of Susan Rice, Hillary, NYT reporters, Obama, and the Demoncrats. For me, this is a no brainer.
The lie concocted by the NYT to aid Hillary is falling apart. How dare they defy Hillary and the NYT?
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise me or Republicanprofessor.
Fast forward, did this paper recently endorse an admitted communist for mayor of New York?
The New York Times is simply a propaganda arm for communists and socialists. It has been so since the 1930's at least. The vast majority of its readers just want to live in the cocoon of their own liberal thoughts. They want their silly ideas reinforced. The Times obliges.
"All the news that's fit to print"? I don't think so. How about: "Read the New York Times, It Beats Thinking".
The Times credibility is Zero.
The New York Times - all the news that’s fit to invent.
This lying story will damage hildebeast and her hubby... the media is exploding over this... the reporter has been on TV three times and has lost all three times. They are now parsing that unless it came directly from bin laden... it is not al qaeda... but that will not fly because al qaeda is now small groups of organized indies who are al qaeda but not part of a centralized core. There will be no president hillary... that dream or nightmare is dead.
Is the New York Times doing a Dan Rather?
Didn't think so.