Sometimes there is. In this case, we need to combat the deception - particularly being foisted on children - that being "gay" is about costume parties when it's really about anal sex.
It's funny how squeamish all these "pundits" are. It's almost as if they'd prefer that we all keep pretending. Maybe we could, if people's lives and souls weren't at stake.
I often think that perhaps some of these sympathisers should be made to watch a “gay” video...
I've also found that surprising since Phil only used the anatomically/medically correct names for what is involved in homosexual acts. If these scribes cannot have that accuracy put into print, perhaps that exposes how badly they've been overlooking the reality and they have been taken in by the PC movement, despite their protestations to the contrary.
agree
what is the difference society is now supposed to embrace and celebrate anyway? If anal sex defines a protected class, then why be squeamish. the love that dare not speak its name has insisted on standing in the public square with a megaphone.
Leftists really hate it when you “go into graphic detail” over what they support.
Leaving aside homosexual behavior, we can simply go into their social welfare programs...
“you mean that you support granting authority to the government to steal, through the threat of deadly force, a gun in the face, the earnings of one person to give to another because you deem the receiver to be worthy?”
Well said and to the precise point. It isn't about decorating, baking, and prancing about. It is not about who they are but what they do. Young impressionable children shouldn't even have this on their plates. We're talking about such a small percentage of the population. Why is it the rest of us have to conform or be smeared and called names?
Definitely. Amazing how their minds work. They’re appalled at “Silent Scream” and Robertson’s description, but they’re silent or even supportive of abortion and homosexuality—never mind gay “marriage.” It’s fine to DO these things, but PLEASE don’t TALK about them. “Hypocrisy” just doesn’t cover it.
Yes, Phil was graphic. But can we call a spade a spade?
As a straight male, I must agree with Phil, to being interested in the vagina, instead of the male anus.
Liberals frequently criticize those who are concerned about graphic depictions on TV and movies of sexual situations, nudity, etc. So why would the liberals be outraged about his talking about parts of the body in this context???
It is the same thing with abortion.
When you talk about it in nice, clean, terms, you can pretend it isn’t about killing children. Tearing them limb from limb, and then using the parts for experiments.
Exactly. BTTT
I totally agree. In fact it was exactly the graphic description that I’m sure infuriated GLAAD and that made Phil’s comment so powerful.
If conservatives want to fight the gay agenda they need to do more of it.
Liking to stick a penis up a man’s ass doesn’t merit celebration or a pride parade, just my humble opinion.