To: Oliviaforever
So the States don’t have the right to define marriage
To: A_Former_Democrat
To: A_Former_Democrat
ask the judge to cite the part of the Constitution where they found this
It’s not there
13 posted on
12/20/2013 2:09:16 PM PST by
GeronL
(Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
To: A_Former_Democrat
States have no rights, thus sayeth the 0.
16 posted on
12/20/2013 2:10:20 PM PST by
mykroar
(We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again. - Nathanael Greene)
To: A_Former_Democrat
So polygamy has to be legal, marrying your sibling must be legal. Where will it end?
To: A_Former_Democrat
The states and by extension the Citizens are subject to the whims of a perverted unelected Federal Judiciary.
Thats a direct result of the South losing the Civil war.
50 posted on
12/20/2013 2:36:07 PM PST by
Rome2000
(THE WASHINGTONIANS AND UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE ARE THE ENEMY -ROTATE THE CAPITAL AMONGST THE STATES)
To: A_Former_Democrat
“So the States don’t have the right to define marriage”
Oh, they do... As long as it’s in favor of the gays. But otherwise, no.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson