Posted on 12/17/2013 6:39:01 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Ping.
The most infuriating thing is, WE SAID THIS, and they scoffed! This is deliberate, incremental, debauchery pushed by the LENINIST LEFT!!!
UN-F-ING BELIEVABLE!.... yet still.. EXTREMELY BELIEVABLE!
Well in order to rebuild a system you have to break it first.
I’m not sure “incremental” is even the right word — these people are stomping on the accelerator.
I read this earlier today (from a Facebook link, go figure).
I think the writer seriously fails to realize the complicated and messy legal can of worms a marriage of 3 or more persons would open.
But it sure would keep the lawyers employed.
Yeah, America needs more slugs with 3 or 4 wives and 28 kids on welfare.
Incremenetal in the sense that they take it stage by stage, saying the next stage will never happen, and then low and behold, they move on to the next stage!
All Americans must be told that these people want to legalize child rape, and if you don’t believe it, think again!
http://youtu.be/sJIWLs18jsU?t=2m23s
I'll take all of them please :)
Yeah, yeah!!! ;)
Oh yeah, I am totally convinced polygamy will be on the table now that same sex marriage is legal.
You are correct. It’s the ratchet effect — always turning a bit more to the Left, never seeming to ever move at all to the Right. These people are experts on incremental change. My observation was technically incorrect, but I just meant that they used to make a big move every 5 years or so — but under Obama they are making their incremental moves to the Left on a monthly basis. It’s unreal.
I had a little gay kid shouting at me outside the polling place a couple of years ago. I said “no gay marriage”.
Then I say why not allow old men to marry their daughters or 4 people marry each other. He said that would “never happen”.
I said “why not?”
He was silent. How can you say “it’s not moral” or aberrant?
Yes, they are speeding up. I honestly didn’t expect polygamy to be on the cards for another few years yet, but here it is!
Khrushchev once said ‘we will bury you’. We have buried ourselves.
Yup. All the “oh, it’s not the same at all” shtick held no real water. If for no other reason than it’s not just about the constitutionality of things. Once you take something that has been as unchanging and set-in-stone as the definition of marriage, and add a radical change to it (gay marriage), the inviolability of the concept is gone. Now, most any faction seeking to challenge the notion of traditional marriage can stake its claim and claim legitimacy. Playing Devil’s Advocate, if we accept that two men can love each other and get married, why can we not accept that a man can love two (or more) women and enter into matrimony with them? That sort of thing.
No, it is time to reconsider allowing government to have any role whatsoever in defining and regulating marriage.
Marriage is defined by God, not the State. When the people of a State were supportive of the godly institution of marriage, their laws tended to be in harmony with God’s Law. But now that forces that are hostile to God’s definition of marriage have gained sufficient control in many States, they are redefining marriage with the intent on destroying it.
In order to save marriage, we must restore the separation between marriage and the State.
lol!
Or Perhaps they are your daughters and you are suggesting I would make a Great Husband! :D
Sharia law ,too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.