Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

Actually, I don’t even think that she gets that far down on the ‘human’ scale. Liberal dogma REQUIRES absolute obedience to all things Democrat, Progressive, and morally rabid. She’s just protecting the number one bastion of liberal irrational thought, the sacrosanct Planned Parenthood and its aftermath.

I would be willing to be a smart debater like Ted Cruz could back her into a philosophical argument where she would have to agree that even her own mother could call for her ‘abortion’ even now. Ignorant bitch.


34 posted on 12/17/2013 11:20:12 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

Did you notice that she rejected any scientific definition in favor of the “strong feelings” of the parents?

Because she’s probably already been backed into a corner with some version of the SLED argument, showing that there is no scientific or logical difference between the unborn and the just born that doesn’t equally exist between a newborn and an adult.


39 posted on 12/17/2013 11:23:52 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson