Posted on 12/12/2013 3:05:27 PM PST by neverdem
The District of Columbia will do anything to stop law-abiding people from owning firearms to defend themselves.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that D.C.s 30-year handgun ban was unconstitutional in the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller decision. In response, Washingtons city council put in place the most onerous gun registration requirement in the country.
So Dick Heller is taking D.C. to court again in a case known as Heller II.
--snip--
Meanwhile, the police recovered 12,000 unregistered firearms from 2007 to 2013.
Officers only found 36 registered guns in that same six-year period. Even then, only 17 of the those firearms were involved in charges against the registered firearm owner, and only two resulted in convictions of that person for a violent crime.
Furthermore, the police also arent using the registration records to solve crimes. Lt. Shelton cannot recall any specific instance where registration records were used to determine who committed a crime, except for possession offenses, the plaintiffs wrote.
Contrary to previous assertions that registration is critical to police safety, the plaintiffs brief uncovers the truth that officers do not have access to registration records before responding to calls.
D.C. maintained for years that guns must be registered so that police officers will know whether a gun is present when they respond to a call, Mr. Halbrook told me.
Yet no good cop would assume that criminals register guns. Now we know that D.C. police dont check the gun registry when on the way to a crime scene, and the reason for registration collapses....
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Bump
Not while I'm taking aim, if you please.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.