To: Red in Blue PA
No.
It needs to be addressed within the US in the context of law and US security.
And it can be.
Snowden’s acts provided no pertinent information to further inform the American public, but did serve to strengthen enemies.
To: ifinnegan
“Snowden’s acts provided no pertinent information to further inform the American public...”
So the wholesale data mining and spying on the American public by our so-called servants is not pertinent? It is to me!
To: ifinnegan
It needs to be addressed within the US in the context of law and US security. And it can be.
Tell me who Snowden could take his concerns to? He would have been fired and the story buried forever. And you know that.
54 posted on
12/03/2013 11:02:26 AM PST by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: ifinnegan
“It needs to be addressed within the US in the context of law and US security.”
Quis custodiet ipso custodes?
To: ifinnegan
It needs to be addressed within the US in the context of law and US security.
Yeah, like Fast & Furious was addressed. Oh wait.....
64 posted on
12/03/2013 11:31:54 AM PST by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: ifinnegan
Snowden’s acts provided no pertinent information to further inform the American public Nonsense. Snowden's whistle-blowing exposed a wide range of NSA corruption and criminality to the American public.
99 posted on
12/05/2013 8:44:44 AM PST by
kobald
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson