Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Post-‘Nuclear Option,’ Liberals Ramp Up Push for Left-Wing Nominees
Newsmax ^ | Friday, 29 Nov 2013 07:32 PM | Greg Richter

Posted on 11/30/2013 1:11:48 PM PST by Olog-hai

With the “nuclear option” in place, President Barack Obama needs only 51 votes to see his executive and judicial nominations brought to a vote. Liberals are seizing the opportunity, pushing Obama to nominate people with a left-of-center ideology, The Hill reports.

Senate Democrats invoked the “nuclear option” on Nov. 21, changing the rule that 60 votes were needed to bring judicial or executive nominees to the Senate floor for a confirmation vote. With only 55 members on their side, Democrats had been unable to prevent Republican filibusters. …

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: harryreid; liberalagenda; nuclearoption; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2013 1:11:48 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

obama should thank Mitch for this.


2 posted on 11/30/2013 1:16:13 PM PST by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Only one cure for this. Retake the senate next year. Then make payback a bitch.


3 posted on 11/30/2013 1:29:02 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Just throw into the mix a Black Swan or two.
If one of our Conservative Supreme Court justices dies soon(illness or otherwise,a “burning of the reichstag” moment by one of the acolytes).
Game Over!*

*: yes I know Supreme Court Approvals in the senate are not affected by the nuclear option.


4 posted on 11/30/2013 1:33:37 PM PST by RBStealth (--raised by wolves, disciplined and educated by nuns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Why do we keep calling them liberals? Why don’t we call them what they are, communists, socialists, marxists. Anything but the tired old, “Liberal.”


5 posted on 11/30/2013 1:43:41 PM PST by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“Only one cure for this. Retake the senate next year. Then make payback a bitch.”

I agree. But, we are talking about the GOP, so they will ask the Dims to share control with them.


6 posted on 11/30/2013 1:44:18 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist

“Why do we keep calling them liberals? Why don’t we call them what they are, communists, socialists, marxists. Anything but the tired old, ‘Liberal.’”

Exactly.


7 posted on 11/30/2013 1:45:34 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Once they disregard the law or the precedent there is nothing that will stop their all consuming power grab except ‘extreme prejudice’. CW II


8 posted on 11/30/2013 1:46:09 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They made their bed. The worm will turn.


9 posted on 11/30/2013 1:47:50 PM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist
Why do we keep calling them liberals? Why don’t we call them what they are, communists, socialists, marxists. Anything but the tired old, “Liberal.”

We need to take a page from the leftist playbook. If we call them communists, socialists, marxists, liberals, progressives, it just gives them the opportunity to confuse the conversation by saying: "Oh, no, no -- if you knew anything about marxists, you'd know politician X is not a marxist, you poor ignorant fool." Same with the other labels.

Time to just use ONE label -- "Left wing extremists." How long have we been listening to them call us "Right wing extremists"?

It is a label that conservatives ought to be throwing at them very . . . um . . . liberally at every opportunity.

10 posted on 11/30/2013 1:52:30 PM PST by Maceman (Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

What would stop the Democrats from changing the rules back requiring 60 votes if they loose the Senate next year?


11 posted on 11/30/2013 1:54:46 PM PST by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rumplemeyer

We change it back upon taking office


12 posted on 11/30/2013 1:56:33 PM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Sounds fine to me. My issue is the term liberal has become trivial. By continuing to call them liberals, I think we marginalize our arguments before we even get started. These people are anti-American, and should be labeled as such.


13 posted on 11/30/2013 1:58:08 PM PST by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Hey Senate RINOs!

Since you reached across the aisle to work with Democrats on a budget deal, how are all them good feelings and brotherly love working out?

Your quest for a more “moderate” government has led to the most extreme left wing government in US history.


14 posted on 11/30/2013 2:18:35 PM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist

Theyre raging Marxists. Bolsheviks In the 1950s they would have been jailed for trying to destroy the constitution. They should all be thrown in Jail now. I still don’t understand how Ayres is not in jail for life or executed.


15 posted on 11/30/2013 2:21:36 PM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist; Maceman
I think it boils down to a liberal tactic that conservatives don't generally have the dishonesty, disingenuosity or stomach to engage in: The control of language.

Liberals understand all too well that controlling the language is a very powerful tool to be used in manipulating those whose understanding of issues and concepts is a mile wide and a nanometer deep.

Like people who understand a con-man's trick, we roll our eyes when we see them use it, we even protest loudly and point it out in detail, but the the con-man just keeps one contemptuous eye on us, smiles inwardly, and fixes his audience with a "Don't pay any attention to them...they are ignorant/jaded/racist/sexist/anti-democratic/(insert your malediction here) and aren't interested in what is best for you. I care about you, and you need to listen to what I say..."

"Homosexual" becomes "gay". "Liberal" becomes "progressive". And so on. They employ this tactic over and over again, and we let them.

And the vacuous, idiotic sheep look deep into the con-man's eyes, turn away from us and back to the con-man, and we go pound sand.

16 posted on 11/30/2013 2:24:25 PM PST by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It may be symbolic but when they try to push crap commie nominees through, the R’s should just go on strike. Call in sick. Walk out. At least, vote “Present”. Flip Harry the bird, literally and figuratively. He wants it this way.


17 posted on 11/30/2013 2:31:41 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rumplemeyer

They wont be in charge and wont have the votes.


18 posted on 11/30/2013 2:31:41 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rumplemeyer

They most certainly will if the “loose” the Senate (BTW, it’s “lose”). The Pubbies can just as easily change it back, but they probably don’t have the guts to do it.


19 posted on 11/30/2013 2:33:39 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Yes they will. They’ll do it in a lame-duck session between the election and the Inauguration of the Senate in January.


20 posted on 11/30/2013 2:35:10 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson