Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry on Iran: 'It's not based on trust'
Politico ^ | 11/24/13 | ANDREA DRUSCH

Posted on 11/24/2013 11:23:35 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
There is complete idiocy reigning supreme in the DemonRat party. Hitlery started it, Obamugabe and Lurch continue it...

Amazingly, I wonder if this SIX MONTH surrender "agreement" with the mullahs of Iran, where they get BILLIONS of dollars and continue to enrich uranium, will be NOTICED by the media for what it really is....

What is this hype? It is a distraction from the disastrous death-panel law that is ruining our liberty and freedom.....

Yes, and as a bonus for this wicked administration, it puts Israel in danger.

1 posted on 11/24/2013 11:23:35 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“It’s based on stupidity!”


2 posted on 11/24/2013 11:25:26 AM PST by Darteaus94025 (Fascist President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“Secretary of State John Kerry says the Iranian nuclear deal is based on verification, not trust with Iran. “

He has a point.

The Allies had verified that Hitler had no more territorial demands after Munich.

Of course they found out that he would just take what he wanted by force.

I guess this time we will have to get wet again like at Dunkirk for it to fully sink in.


3 posted on 11/24/2013 11:27:53 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Democrats gulled by rug merchants—again. This is getting to be a pattern.


4 posted on 11/24/2013 11:28:02 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Asked if he were skeptical whether Iran would actually comply with the signed deal, Kerry said trust wasn’t necessary, and no one was expecting Iran to “turn over a new leaf.”

Who signs a deal with a party who cannot be trusted to honor it? The Obama administration.

5 posted on 11/24/2013 11:29:52 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darteaus94025

During one round of inspections the UN team was fooled by a wall of boxes used to hide equipment In building.


6 posted on 11/24/2013 11:30:41 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

this “agreement” is not based on trust because it allows Iran to continue building its nuclear bombs and ICBM’s ...
so there is nothing to trust them to do ...
except cash our $8 BILLION free money check, that is.
(the IslamoNazis will cash our check, no trust is required, they’ll cash it for sure, wouldn’t you!? ).

What a phuquing pharce!

This is the dangerous, treasonous garbage we get for electing You Know Who ...
a FURTHER build-up of Iran’s nukes so they can bomb the S**t out of their “Great Satan” (all protected by our great USAF, alas... put the wrong crowd in charge and the greatest airmen in the world have their mission sabotaged)

(at least Chamberlain didn’t give the German Nazis 8 Billion free pounds sterling to help them build nukes and V-2’s)


7 posted on 11/24/2013 11:36:34 AM PST by faithhopecharity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

The horsefaced one was involved in making “the deal”. You know America and Israel took it in the shorts and the bad guys were the big winners. It’s how Hanoi Boi the “Winter Soldier” works.


8 posted on 11/24/2013 11:37:23 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my health insurance policy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“It’s not based on trust. We were paid up front.”


9 posted on 11/24/2013 11:44:48 AM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/nicolae-hussein-obama/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Deja Vu North Korea.....


10 posted on 11/24/2013 11:45:08 AM PST by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Who signs a deal with a party who cannot be trusted to honor it? The Obama administration.

Who signs a deal with a party who cannot be trusted to honor it? Iran just did.

11 posted on 11/24/2013 11:47:04 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darteaus94025

Yep. They really are that stupid, to paraphrase the President.


12 posted on 11/24/2013 11:49:08 AM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Oh, I don’t think for one minute that Obama won’t give Iran billions in US aid, unfreeze iranian assets, remove embargoes, etc. as I sure is stipulated by the agreement while Iran goes merrily about its nuclear weapons program. These are agreements the commies in DC always honor.


13 posted on 11/24/2013 11:51:45 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

So John Frikken Kerry storms into the Khomaini’s office and slams a bottle down on his desk.
‘Dammit Abdul! You told me these were ‘smart pills’. I had them analyzed at the FBI HQ. Why, they’re nothing but rabbit turds!”

“Ah! Yes yes my horsefaced American friend. But surely you must see.
Now you are getting smart.”

Kerry: “Don’t call me Shirley!”


14 posted on 11/24/2013 11:55:53 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

We give Iran 8 billion dollars to pretend to stop enriching uranium, and then we pretend to check on them and not notice that they never stopped.


15 posted on 11/24/2013 12:05:24 PM PST by oldbrowser (The debt limit is the emergency brake on government spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Iran got their part of the deal guaranteed up front.

We’re the ones in the sucker role.


16 posted on 11/24/2013 12:06:46 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

yes...but according to both the French news service and the Iranian government press office, the agreement does not even ask Iran to stop its nuclear bomb program

we MAY ask to go check whatever, for appearance sake, but the Iranians have already officially announced that their nuclear development program WILL CONTINUE uninterrupted.


17 posted on 11/24/2013 12:12:28 PM PST by faithhopecharity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I give it about 48 months before Iran tests it’s first nuke.

Six months wouldn’t surprise me.


18 posted on 11/24/2013 12:20:00 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Obama, the Democrat Party, the Left in the U. S., have essentially become the 4th Reich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

How long did it take North Korea after they promised not to make them in exchange for nuclear power reactors that cost billions?


19 posted on 11/24/2013 12:23:19 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ...

That’s right, it’s BASED ON SURRENDER.

Going over to the enemy is easy for Lurch.


20 posted on 11/24/2013 12:24:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson