Posted on 11/14/2013 1:37:44 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
For someone the Democrats have declared irrelevant, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin seems to be surprisingly relevant. According to the left, Palin hasnt been a real factor since 2008. Yet every time she so much as makes a run to the grocery store, liberals scrutinize her behavior like disgraced Internal Revenue Service thug Lois Lerner reading Tea Party tax returns.
While conservatives, many of whom genuinely like Palin, invite her to break bread with them at various functions, liberals whine about her near omnipresence all while fawning like groupies in an effort to entice her as an interview subject. Id suggest the quest for ratings and subsequent advertising dollars drives them to seek out Palin the way lepers sought out Mother Teresa; but no self-respecting liberal would be in it just for the money and fame, right?
Monday morning, Palin graced the studios of NBCs Today Show, where Matt Lauer attempted to press her on Obamacare something Lauers fellow NBC talking head Chuck Todd was either unwilling or unable to do to President Barack Obama last Thursday. Of course, Lauer may be bright enough to know Palin equals ratings; but hes clearly not bright enough to have learned Palin equals smarter than the women who make MSNBC such a ratings success. Palin dispensed with Lauer as easily as Michael Moore dispenses with anything coated in powdered sugar.
"People who are being told today if you and some of them are still being told Well, if you like that insurance policy and that coverage, you still will be able to keep it. Its just going to cost you a little bit more. Thats the point, if its going to cost you more, then its not the same policy."
If NBC, which is as redoubtable a Barack Obama Administration mouthpiece as White House press secretary Jay Carney, thought Palins views were worth their airtime, logic would dictate that the unbathed liberal masses would concur. Unfortunately, logic and liberalism collide as often as MSNBC and decent ratings. Yet the perfectly named left-wing hate speech blog Talking Points Memo reacted to Palins entirely accurate remarks about the lies Obama told to keep his train wreck on the rails by changing the subject.
When asked by Matt Lauer about her alternative plan, Palin gave a rambling answer that echoed her infamous 2008 interview with Katie Couric, in which the former Republican vice presidential nominee awkwardly struggled to name a newspaper or magazine she often read.
Lauer invited her to talk about Obamacares face-plant, and the liberals come up with: Palin is stupid, because um 2008!
Part of the lefts assaults against Palin stem from the same misogyny that has defined the Democrats for as long as Democrats have skittered across the fruited plains. These guys really dont like women who dont do what theyre told. They also seem to have a problem with women who look like women, but thats a conversation for another day. Their attacks on Palin are virtually reflexive. Every time she speaks, Bill Mahers staff gets jumpy. In fact, anytime any conservative woman raises her flag, the Democrats hate machine redlines its tachometer.
But part of this latest assault on Palin stems from the Democrats increasing desperation over the implosion of Obamacare. Keeping in mind that the Democrats consider politics vastly more important than everything, up to and including life itself, any dissent represents a commensurately grave threat. When someone like Palin takes to the airwaves to voice her discontent with Obamas train wreck of a power grab, liberals go apoplectic.
To be honest, I dont think Palin should run for President in 2016 for a number of reasons among them, her own safety. From the so-called Occupy riots to pretty much anything involving more than one union thug, the Democrats have demonstrated a propensity for violence at the drop of Carlos Dangers zipper. Combine their lack of compunction with the white-hot rage that Palin still inspires more than half a decade since they first declared her irrelevant, and youve got a perfect environment for some loon in a Che T-shirt to trade his life for a weeks worth of admiring references on Ivy League professors Twitter feeds. Theyre pressing a $2 trillion fraud, something for which non-Democrats risk serious prison time; and theyve already attacked her children more than once. I doubt theyd hesitate to push one of their followers over the line between foaming at the mouth with anti-Palin hate and Mumia Abu-Jamal.
You have friends here, lots of 'em.
Plano? I might have to go to that one, if I can get my car nursed back to health!
Hey! Here in South Carolina, we know very little compared to all Tex-uns, except we know to keep our horse healthy and a mule as back-up ride.
Both my horse and mule were confiscated & shipped to Trayvon’s folks for their 40 acres.
Too bad that happened to you. That’s when a firearm and some mean sidekicks come in handy.
Maybe I didn’t love you
Quite as often as I could have
And maybe I didn’t treat you
Quite as good as I should have
If I made you feel second best
Girl, I’m sorry I was blind
You were always on my mind
You were always on my mind
And maybe I didn’t hold you
All those lonely, lonely times
And I guess I never told you
I’m so happy that you’re mine
Little things I should have said and done
I just never took the time
But you were always on my mind
You were always on my mind
Tell me, tell me that your sweet love hasn’t died
And give me, give me one more chance
To keep you satisfied
I’ll keep you satisfied
Little things I should have said and done
I just never took the time
But you were always on my mind
You were always on my mind
You were always on my mind
-Willie Nelson
The missionaries of the back country areas in the Yucatan Peninsula used to use them all the time.
You’ll need more than 50...you have to protect the whole family.
I still think the Palin’s were threatened to stay out in 2012. But then, I just look good in tin foil.
and for you grammar nazis... it should be Palins...not Palin’s.
I’d LOVE to see Palin run against Hillary! That would be a scenario that would be just too uncomfortable for Hillary. And, a Palin presidency would be more than welcome, knowing what she took on in Alaska and the no-nonsense person that she is. But, I’m also wondering who would fill her shoes in the theater of picking genuine conservatives? Yes, she missed on a few, and maybe they just got turned after being elected...who knows. But she has an uncanny sense that is developing more accurately every year. It takes time to hone those skills. She is still my first pick, but Ted Cruz is my second by a mile over the rest. I like Mike Lee, as well. He’s coming along very nicely, too. There are few that would be really great presidential material because they don’t have the cojones to stand firm. They would compromise way too quickly. Palin, Cruz and Lee are our best bets for no-nonsense leadership with true conservative credentials. I like Jeff Sessions, but I don’t think he could win nationally. Rand Paul is really a libertarian, and if one wants to understand who they truly are, look no further than the VA pre-election family values pamphlet put out on www.familyfoundation.org and www.vavotes.net. You could BARELY tell the difference in ideology from the democrat and the libertarian. That is the point. This is not isolated. This is true to form. They are a one issue party...small government, but they will vote with the democrats on everything else.
Lol.
Mules must be something else. Horse/donkey. Courageous, strong, tenacious, ornery. They have the big ears of the donkey but the strength of the horse. Those missionaries swear by them. NOTHING bothers the them while they're on their mules. I can see why.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.