Skip to comments.Lindsey Grahamís fourth GOP challenger Bill Connor announces run at Myrtle Beach Tea Party event
Posted on 11/12/2013 5:32:03 AM PST by cotton1706
COLUMBIA U.S. Army veteran and Orangeburg attorney Bill Connor announced his candidacy for U.S. Senate Monday at a Myrtle Beach Tea Party meeting.Connor joins Spartanburg state Sen. Lee Bright, Easley businessman Richard Cash and Charleston PR executive Nancy Mace as the fourth candidate challenging U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham in the June GOP primary.The only one of Grahams challengers to run a statewide race, Connor ran for lieutenant governor in 2010 and lost in a runoff.A Monday news release on Connors newly launched website said that Unlike some, Bill Connor wears the label of Tea Party Republican proudly.In a video posted on Connors website and timed with his announcement, Connor says, A small federal government our founders intended was for citizen legislators, people who would take time away from their families and businesses for a few years, do whats right for our countrys future, then come home and live under the laws they pass.After nearly two decades in Washington Lindsey Grahams values and votes look more like they came more from a congressional conference table, Connor says in the video, accusing Graham of supporting conservative causes near election time.
(Excerpt) Read more at thestate.com ...
Opposition and choices are great, but I can't help but wonder if Linda Graham is secretly supporting some of these challengers in hope that they will splinter the vote in the primary with him coming out on top.
You are correct. It also splits up the Anti-Graham money 4 ways.
4 challengers — Divide the conservative vote and conquer. Is South Carolina a plurality wins the primary state or is there a run-off?
If not a run-off state, You gotta hand it to the GOP-E; they have truly perfected the game they play.
I would imagine that at least one of those “conservatives” are plants. The others are just dunces, if they don’t realize the necessity of narrowing the field all by themselves.
There’s a runoff if no candidate get’s over 50%. In a five person race, it’s unlikely Graham would be able to top 50%. Then we take him out in a runoff as we did Dewhurst!
The way around this problem is for the Tea Party to present the four challengers with an agreement, that by a date certain, whichever of them leads in a “pre-primary”, as judged by a poll of the Tea Party membership, or even registered Republicans, will become the single nominee, and the others agree to drop out and give their support to him.
They either sign the agreement, or they are immediately cut off, and are no longer endorsed by the Tea Party, and those who do sign can call them “spoilers”, and reject them as nothing other than agents trying to get Graham re-elected as a “dirty trick”.
Yes, it is serious, but it is also good strategy. If a candidate cannot control their ego enough to support another candidate who is better than they are, they do not deserve to be elected.
I absolutely wish our presidential election required a run-off if no one over 50%.
It doesn't work that way in a run-off primary. The more the better is the rule if you're trying to take down an entrenched candidate. That is how Cruz beat Dewhurst in TX. Dewhurst easily got the plurality of votes but he didn't get 50%. Thus, he had to face a run-off against Cruz alone. The contrast destroyed him. We can do the same to Lindsey
I agree that we need a much narrower field. True tea partiers should sit down with tea party candidates and figure out a strategy of quickly determining the most viable tea party candidate and uniting around him or her.
Let them run but they should agree to exit the race when it becomes apparent who is the strongest tea party candidate.
No need to narrow the field down just yet, the primary is designed to do that.
In South Carolina, if no candidate receives 50% or more of the vote, there will be a runoff. Therefore, it’s not a bad thing to pack the field when attempting to unseat an entrenched incumbent.
Diluting the opposition isn’t going to accomplish anything but assure another term for Graham. Conservatives need to coalesce behind a single opponent.
Wish we had that law here in VA.
Out with the old MILK and in with the new TEA.
The plan is to keep Graham under 50% so there’s a runoff. The second person will likely be Lee Bright, who’s gaining strength. Then in a one on one contest between Graham and Bright, we take out Graham.
Similar to the Dewhurst/Cruz race in Texas last year.
The time to unite behind a single opposition candidate in primarying Graham would be the runoff vote. Packing the field to get there is solid strategy.
Exactly. And you want a strong candidate to emerge from the vetting process. No more Herman Cain surprises, please.
Well, that's not going to happen. I'd like the chances of ousting Graham a lot better if one of the Republican Congressmen jumped into the race. Joe ("You lie!") Wilson, or Mick Mulvaney, or best of all, Trey Gowdy.
BINGO, too many challengers spoils to soup.
Terry McAwful knows what works. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a major “third party challenger” in 2016 when Hillary Clinton runs.
Exactly, keep him under 50%
When is the primary? Runoff?
The primary’s on 6/10/14.
“The best thing that could happen, and I hope it does, is that LG finishes THIRD in the primary.”
Oh, absolutely this would be the best possible outcome. He would be removed from power. And he would be free to vote with the democrats openly for the remainder of the year.
I’ve met Bill Connor. Lt. Col, SC National Guard, Afghanistan vet, solid conservative, good resume IMO.
Trey Gowdy has said it’s not his time to try for the Senate yet. He is being very effective as part of the House majority.
Flimsey Tinkerbelle will be pulled down into a runoff by the sheer weight of primary contenders (thank you, S.C. laws). When he is forced to attack other Republicans, he will be exposed as a snippy little drama queen; his faux conservatism won’t wash as the real conservatives give him what for. They’ll hang McCain around his neck for starters.
“If Graham doesn’t get 50% of the vote, it goes to a run-off election. The more to take away votes from Graham and keep him from 50% the better.”
And that is the key. Think runoff Ted Cruz had with the establisment Dewhurst.\
And now we Texans have given you Ted Cruz. (accolades).
For those of you complaining about splitting the vote, etc., learn how a primary is run in South Carolina. Go here, scroll down a little and read the red text.
Uber RINO Lindsey Ping
"Republican by day, Democrat by night."
Want on or off this ping list?
Just FReepmail me
“Let them run but they should agree to exit the race when it becomes apparent who is the strongest tea party candidate.”
“I absolutely wish our presidential election required a run-off if no one over 50%.”
If Lindsey Graham is held below 50% and Bill Connor finishes second, how long before the Harpootlian and the SC Democrat Party changes Bill’s name to Bull? BTW, does Harpootlian still say that Lindsey Graham is “too light in the loafers” to be a Senator, or do SC Democrats wisely shut up and not look a gift horse in the mouth?
>>SC is a run-off state. And it has a sore-loser law. Graham can’t run under another party if he loses the primary.
I just wish it wasn’t an open-primary state. All the rats will be voting for Graham in the primary.
Yep. A do-over with the top two names on each ballot.
We don’t have an electoral college in the way it was originally designed in which they actually selected the president by delegate voting
Section. 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; a quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President [Modified by Amendment XII].
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
[Proposed 1962; Ratified 1964]
Section. 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
Section. 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Sounds like someone working for LG, trying to divide the anti-Lindsey vote.
I think you might be right
Lindsey’s ace-in-the-hole is not only the support of the popular John McPain but Democrats can legally “cross over” and vote for Lindsey and thus offset the conservative opponents! I am reasonably sure that Lindsey will win it all! People in SC are really uninformed.
God loves a runoff my man.
wish we had them here in Davy Crockett land
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.