To: The Sons of Liberty
If Graham doesn't get 50% of the vote, it goes to a run-off election. The more to take away votes from Graham and keep him from 50% the better.
/johnny
To: JRandomFreeper
You know what would really be funny? A runoff -- without Graham, after he finished third.
Well, that's not going to happen. I'd like the chances of ousting Graham a lot better if one of the Republican Congressmen jumped into the race. Joe ("You lie!") Wilson, or Mick Mulvaney, or best of all, Trey Gowdy.
22 posted on
11/12/2013 6:08:13 AM PST by
southernnorthcarolina
("Better be wise by the misfortunes of others than by your own." -- Aesop)
To: JRandomFreeper
“If Graham doesn’t get 50% of the vote, it goes to a run-off election. The more to take away votes from Graham and keep him from 50% the better.”
And that is the key. Think runoff Ted Cruz had with the establisment Dewhurst.\
And now we Texans have given you Ted Cruz. (accolades).
33 posted on
11/12/2013 6:22:33 AM PST by
bestintxas
(Obamacare = Obamascrew)
To: JRandomFreeper
Wish I saw that before I posted.
Forgot SC had a runoff.
56 posted on
11/12/2013 10:24:55 AM PST by
Darren McCarty
(Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
To: JRandomFreeper
Happy to see there is the 50% runoff rule. A 4 way Republican senate primary in Wisconsin in 2012, with no such rule, gave away a winnable senate seat. I believe that happened in Missouri as well.
73 posted on
11/13/2013 6:51:04 PM PST by
Hamilcar_Barca
(Keep the main thing, the main thing - defeat Obama)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson