Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red in Blue PA

The right of the people...to keep and bear arms...shall not be infringed...

Okay, Dick, I’ll answer your questions.

1. If you believe the 2nd Amendment should be subject to no regulation at all, do you therefore believe all laws prohibiting convicted violent repeat criminals from having guns are unconstitutional? Should all such laws be repealed?

Violent repeat offenders are a product of a failed judicial system and an indicator of a weak society. They should either be behind bars for life or they should be sentenced to death if they are not able to walk among us peaceably. Yes, a punishment cannot be eternal, once a sentence has been completed, fundamental rights ought to be restored. Disenfranchising permanently those convicted of non violent crimes is unconscionable. If a violent crime is committed, then swift and sure punishment ought to follow; carry anything should be impossible...think death penalty for crimes that warrant it. Other crimes; (felonies we are talking about), I suppose, as they result in GCA of 68 prohibition- gosh, from 1789 until 1968 at the federal level, felons could possess firearms, why the big deal after 68? Hmmm, it is about control, felons are controlled, make more felons, control more people.

2. Do you also believe all laws establishing concealed-carry licenses are unconstitutional?

What part of infringed don’t you understand? Can the government require me to register my faith, my conscience? Why my ability to pursue life and liberty? Is not that one of the fundamental rights described by the Declaration of Independence as a reason why the colonies revolted? If it was adequate justification for the people of 1776, why not us in 2013?

3. Do you have a concealed-carry license anyway?

Yes, and I cannot justify my inadequacy in principle. However, I will exercise my right to keep and bear arms in every lawful way possible, CCW permit or not.

4. Are you thereby violating the Constitution yourself?

No, only the government can violate the constitution, we can only violate laws written by the process outlined by the document, and if anyone thinks the bazillion laws of the US Code are constitutional by mere existence, they have not learned much about liberty and freedom. The Constitution is the format by which we implicitly or explicitly give/gave power to the government, but does not relinquish inalienable rights from any citizen.

Best;


9 posted on 11/08/2013 4:12:10 PM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Manly Warrior

Great post!


12 posted on 11/08/2013 4:20:09 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Manly Warrior

Great post. Concise, thorough.

Really. Thank you for posting.


14 posted on 11/08/2013 4:51:01 PM PST by ziravan (Choose Sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Manly Warrior

Well-done!


30 posted on 11/08/2013 5:58:55 PM PST by Carriage Hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson