Posted on 11/01/2013 10:25:55 AM PDT by jazusamo
keyboard spew alert
” women’s right to decide whether and when to have children”
I’ve always thought that women made that choice right before they spread their legs. What we’re talking about is a second choice.
Yeah but so what. They’ll just do what they want anyway.
This is a big F’n deal!! Yay!
I wonder how many people have already had their policies terminated because their existing plan didn’t provide for birth control (therefore substandard under previous Obamacare). If any, do they get to have their policies back?
I can’t find the case I’m thinking of, but I like her.
A real blessing would be if the government put contraceptives in all the malt liquor and urban water supplies. All bamaPhones should come with a dermal release contraceptive too. If future Americans all grew up with some ambition and work ethic this country could be great again.
God Blessed America!!!!
It would have to be summarily struck down.
IF the present court system actually followed the written law instead of what they personally feel is right.
Ohio Ping
Friday’s ruling centered on two Catholic brothers, Francis and Philip Gilardi, who own a 400-person produce company based in Ohio. ****
The brothers oppose contraception as part of their religion and challenged the Affordable Care Act provision requiring them to provide insurance that covers their employees’ birth control.
Refusing to abide by the letter of the law, they said, would result in a $14 million fine.
snip
The Obama administration said that the requirement is necessary to protect women’s right to decide whether and when to have children.
The judges were unconvinced, however, that forcing companies to cover contraception protected that right.
Keep destroying this piece of crap.
Cut it up, like a whale if you have to, in order to blast the entire damn thing all to hell.
It is, for better or worse, a multiple choice test.
Two of whcih should not be funded by me.
Amen...If that’s what it takes to kill this abortion of a bill, do it!
Thanks for the question.
It looks like the contraception regulation was created by Sebelius as a response to the preventative care mandate of the law.
So severability does not apply.
Damnit...
“Didn’t she also rule on a case in Bush vs Gore?”
No. She was not on the bench at that point. G W Bush nominated her to the DC Circuit.
HOORAY!!
Now let's see if this is upheld when it goes to the SC.
For now, though, hooray for Judge Janice Rogers Brown and whoever the other judge is!
First the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling upholding (temporarily) the Texas Abortion law and now this.
I’ve almost forgotten what good news looks like.
Thanks Katieanna
I hear you, good news has been scarce lately.
This is big.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.