Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court strikes down mandate for birth control in ObamaCare
The Hill ^ | November 1, 2013 | Julian Hattem

Posted on 11/01/2013 10:25:55 AM PDT by jazusamo

A federal appeals court on Friday struck down the birth control mandate in ObamaCare, concluding the requirement trammels religious freedom.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals — the second most influential bench in the land behind the Supreme Court — ruled 2-1 in favor of business owners who are fighting the requirement that they provide their employees with health insurance that covers birth control.

Requiring companies to cover their employees’ contraception, the court ruled, is unduly burdensome for business owners who oppose birth control on religious grounds, even if they are not purchasing the contraception directly.

“The burden on religious exercise does not occur at the point of contraceptive purchase; instead, it occurs when a company’s owners fill the basket of goods and services that constitute a healthcare plan,” Judge Janice Rogers Brown wrote on behalf of the court.

Legal analysts expect the Supreme Court to ultimately pick up an appeal on the birth-control requirement and make a final decision on its constitutionality.

In the meantime, Republicans in Congress have pushed for a conscience clause that would allow employers to opt out of providing contraception coverage for moral or religious reasons.

The measure emerged most recently during negotiations to fund the federal government. Some House Republicans wanted to include the conscience clause in a legislative package ending the government shutdown.

The split ruling against the government on Friday was the latest in a string of court cases challenging the healthcare law’s mandate.

Friday’s ruling centered on two Catholic brothers, Francis and Philip Gilardi, who own a 400-person produce company based in Ohio.

The brothers oppose contraception as part of their religion and challenged the Affordable Care Act provision requiring them to provide insurance that covers their employees' birth control.

Refusing to abide by the letter of the law, they said, would result in a $14 million fine.

“They can either abide by the sacred tenets of their faith, pay a penalty of over $14 million, and cripple the companies they have spent a lifetime building, or they become complicit in a grave moral wrong,” Brown wrote.

The Obama administration said that the requirement is necessary to protect women’s right to decide whether and when to have children.

The judges were unconvinced, however, that forcing companies to cover contraception protected that right.

Brown wrote that “it is clear the government has failed to demonstrate how such a right — whether described as noninterference, privacy, or autonomy — can extend to the compelled subsidization of a woman’s procreative practices.”

She added that denying coverage of contraception would not undermine the Affordable Care Act’s requirements that health insurance provide preventative care.

The Gilardis’ employees will still be covered for a series of counseling, screenings and tests, she noted.

“The provision of these services — even without the contraceptive mandate — by and large fulfills the statutory command for insurers to provide gender-specific preventive care,” she wrote. “At the very least, the statutory scheme will not go to pieces.”

The two other judges on the panel disagreed with parts of the ruling and said the rights of religious people do not extend to the companies they own. They also disputed that the Gilardis were unduly burdened by the coverage requirement.

Churches and other houses of worship are exempt from the ObamaCare mandate to cover contraception. People who work for religiously affiliated institutions can get birth control directly from their insurance companies.

— This story was updated at 12:52 p.m.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: abortion; birthcontrol; dccourtofappeals; deathpanels; mandate; obamacare; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-136 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2013 10:25:55 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yes!!


2 posted on 11/01/2013 10:26:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

3 posted on 11/01/2013 10:27:51 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45 ( Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; All

Please Help To Keep The
"Conservative News and Views"
On FR Coming By "Clicking Here"!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


4 posted on 11/01/2013 10:27:53 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

0bama and the Rats are really ticked at the D.C. Court of Appeals now!


5 posted on 11/01/2013 10:28:09 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Excellent!


6 posted on 11/01/2013 10:28:14 AM PDT by Maelstorm (Obamacare is your healthcare on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ironically this mandate helped Obama get elected.
He doesnt care about it now.


7 posted on 11/01/2013 10:28:27 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US Citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Sandra was quite distressed at the news...


8 posted on 11/01/2013 10:29:25 AM PDT by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thank you Lord!


9 posted on 11/01/2013 10:29:26 AM PDT by CityCenter (Resist Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The two other judges on the panel disagreed with parts of the ruling and said the rights of religious people do not extend to the companies they own.

Other judges? This line appears to contradict the rest of the article.

10 posted on 11/01/2013 10:29:40 AM PDT by deadrock (I am someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Does this mean Hobby Lobby will stay in business?!?!?!?


11 posted on 11/01/2013 10:30:25 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses; SunkenCiv; MHGinTN; neverdem; Sacajaweau

And so, if abortion is “a constitutional right” because of some assumed “right of privacy” found by 5 judges, why is Obamacare REQUIRED to demand we load ALL of a person’s medical, financial, tax and gun ownership information into a single government database just to satisfy the government’s desire to control all health care information?


12 posted on 11/01/2013 10:31:58 AM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Pepper the courts with lawsuits and class action suits against the ACA. It won't take too many injunctions or stay orders to collapse the whole edifice.

Congressional republicans can sit back and say they won't interfere and let the process work it's way through the courts. That's what progressives do to laws they don't like.

13 posted on 11/01/2013 10:32:05 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

OscamOcare continues to take body blows from all directions... Without an opposition party to repeal it #RINOScum, it needs to be attacked from all directions...

Let’s see what happens when the suit to force the employer mandate is heard... Delicious!


14 posted on 11/01/2013 10:34:27 AM PDT by bfh333 ("Hope"... "Change"... You better HOPE you have some CHANGE after the next 4 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Hang this argument and pending case around the necks of Dem pols running for office. I especially want to see that beech in Texas, Wendy Davis be forced to answer if she supports jamming this caropla down the throats of small businesses. Also nail it to that creep McAuliffe in Va.


15 posted on 11/01/2013 10:35:18 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

16 posted on 11/01/2013 10:35:24 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

17 posted on 11/01/2013 10:35:31 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Now we know why Obamma wants to pack the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals


18 posted on 11/01/2013 10:36:34 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

ANY court ruling ANY aspect of Obama’s fascist law unconstitutional exposes the pirate Roberts and his illicit ruling to pass this abomination onto the American public. Any doubt about for whom Roberts works should now be settled. Little barry bastard boy’s regime own Roberts.


19 posted on 11/01/2013 10:36:57 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT
I'm thinking this is a huge victory for Hobby Lobby. The gubmint should be forced to pay their legal costs, too.

The only problem is an appeal to the SCROTUS. John Roberts cannot be trusted.

20 posted on 11/01/2013 10:38:17 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

All Saints Day!!!


21 posted on 11/01/2013 10:39:11 AM PDT by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

The two other judges on the panel disagreed with parts of the ruling and said the rights of religious people do not extend to the companies they own.

Other judges? This line appears to contradict the rest of the article.
******************************************************************
It does. The article is unclear and poorly written—as happens frequently in modern “journalism”.


22 posted on 11/01/2013 10:39:43 AM PDT by House Atreides ( D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Judge Janice Rogers Brown

Didn't she also rule on a case in Bush vs Gore?

I like her
23 posted on 11/01/2013 10:40:48 AM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

There being no severalbility clause, how is it the law can stand in whole.

It would have to be summarily struck down.


24 posted on 11/01/2013 10:41:43 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Wow!!
How is that pig Sandra Fluke going to stay unpregnant now?


25 posted on 11/01/2013 10:42:41 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Whats chief inJustice John RobsUS gonna do—call it a contraceptive tax? I’m betting that POS doesn’t fold this time around. How come Scalia didnt get the job of chief?
Another Bush SCOTUS screw up....


26 posted on 11/01/2013 10:42:54 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fella

Exactly...The hand writing was on the wall when they shot him down on the NLRB illegal appointees and they’ll be a lot of cases coming up on 0care.


27 posted on 11/01/2013 10:43:26 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; Allegra; big'ol_freeper; Lil'freeper; shove_it; TrueKnightGalahad; Cincinatus' Wife; ...
This is great news... that is until Chief Justice Roberts morphs it into another constitutional tax--
28 posted on 11/01/2013 10:43:26 AM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

After the unanimous ruling by the court regarding who religous schools can hire, I have little doubt that the majority of the court (even the libs) will support this decision. You cannot remove a person’s consitutional rights from them by virtue of the fact that they own and run a private business.


29 posted on 11/01/2013 10:43:46 AM PDT by CityCenter (Resist Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Hey Dems, there goes the Julia vote...


30 posted on 11/01/2013 10:45:31 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

An ocean liner takes time to do a 180 but it looks like OUR ship is slowly turning to the right despite the efforts of a Marxist captain to stop it.

Great news.


31 posted on 11/01/2013 10:46:06 AM PDT by RetSignman (As Goes America, So Goes the World. A Communist America, A Communist World.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady

I can’t remember the cases she’s ruled on but all the lib organizations call her an extreme right-winger, she’s my kind of judge. :-)


32 posted on 11/01/2013 10:46:44 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
How is that pig Sandra Fluke going to stay unpregnant now?

By switching teams?

33 posted on 11/01/2013 10:46:51 AM PDT by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CityCenter

A regime that no longer honors the Constitution can do anything they want to do, especially with the pirate Roberts soiling the high court bench.


34 posted on 11/01/2013 10:47:58 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tflabo
Whats chief inJustice John RobsUS gonna do

Exactly whatever the people blackmailing him tell him to do.

Or he could man-up.

35 posted on 11/01/2013 10:48:21 AM PDT by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I agree but they all have seemed to ignore that fact. There was a lot of talk about that right after it was jammed down our throats but I haven’t heard a thing about it in some time.


36 posted on 11/01/2013 10:49:07 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Wow!


37 posted on 11/01/2013 10:49:07 AM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; a fool in paradise
Judge Roberts, White House is calling: "Your Honor, the President would like to know how your adopted children are doing."
38 posted on 11/01/2013 10:49:09 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I will be interested to see if Roberts upholds this court’s decision.

He is supposed to be a Catholic after all.


39 posted on 11/01/2013 10:49:23 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Contraceptives are cheap. There’s no reason the government has to buy them for you.


40 posted on 11/01/2013 10:49:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Praise God!


41 posted on 11/01/2013 10:49:56 AM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady
Didn't she also rule on a case in Bush vs Gore?

I don't believe she was involved in those rulings. Janice Rogers Brown is, however, the scumbag Democrats' worst nightmare. She is a black woman, and she is brilliant. And she is a conservative who takes the Constitution seriously. (Like I said, the scumbag rats' worst nightmare.)

The rats did everything in their power to stop her confirmation but she ended up getting confirmed following the "Gang of 14" negotiations back in 2006.

42 posted on 11/01/2013 10:50:27 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

LOL! I hope she suffers apoplexy over this.


43 posted on 11/01/2013 10:50:42 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

Hoy Lobby was on hold IIRC...this should filter down to them as good news!!


44 posted on 11/01/2013 10:50:53 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

She might actually have to entertain the notion of abstinence.

The indignity of it all!


45 posted on 11/01/2013 10:50:55 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

IIRC, there is no “severability” clause in the ACA... therefor by logic and reason, the ehtire law is unconstituitional... how does Roberts CJ save that?


46 posted on 11/01/2013 10:51:41 AM PDT by Will not Live for another Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Which insurance companies will now offer insurance without birth control coverage?

The White House will pressure them not to.


47 posted on 11/01/2013 10:51:50 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

Three judge panel. At least two of them got to the same end, but perhaps via different routes.


48 posted on 11/01/2013 10:52:05 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Is birth control and abortion part of the law or part of a hhs rule permitted by the law? if the latter, then perhaps the rule can be ruled unconstitutional while not tripping the law and the severability clause... IANAL...


49 posted on 11/01/2013 10:52:19 AM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
***The Obama administration said that the requirement is necessary to protect women’s right to decide whether and when to have children.***

Women can choose to do whatever they want. Doesn't mean they should be subsdized by the employer.

50 posted on 11/01/2013 10:52:51 AM PDT by Gamecock (Many Atheists take the stand: "There is no God AND I hate Him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson