Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interior chief Sally Jewell says Obama will go around Congress on national monuments [land grab]
Washington Examiner ^ | October 31, 2013 | Zack Colman

Posted on 10/31/2013 1:36:17 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Department of Interior Secretary Sally Jewell vowed that President Obama would use executive authority to create more national monuments to protect lands if Congress doesn't pass legislation to do so.

"If Congress doesn't step up to act," Jewell said during a speech at the National Press Club in Washington, "then the president will take action."

Obama has used the more than century-old Antiquities Act to establish national monuments nine times, with six coming in the last year. The administration has said it would use the law only if local communities can demonstrate there is significant support for such action.

Those moves have invited backlash from House Republicans, contending those decisions are best left to Congress.

Congress hasn't approved a new national monument or park since 2010, with Republicans charging that the White House is keeping too much federal land off limits to oil and gas development.

Republicans say the shale energy boom could be replicated on federal lands, enhancing energy security and bringing more revenue to the Treasury.

The administration, however, notes that most shale plays are located on state and private lands outside of its control.

Jewell touched on that dynamic in her speech, referring to the Bakken shale formation that is the heart of the U.S. energy boom.

The Bakken nestles up against Theodore Roosevelt National Park along North Dakota's western border with Montana, providing an example of where conservation and development have the potential to clash, Jewell noted.

Emboldened by public cries to reopen the national parks during the federal government shutdown earlier this month, Jewell also called for stronger congressional support for national parks and federal lands.

She said the 16-day shutdown "clarified" the importance of parks, adding it cost communities near national parks an estimated $76 million per day.

The shutdown helped "shine the spotlight on just how much Americans love their public lands and the people that serve them," Jewell said.

But parks funding has been under attack by budget-conscious conservatives and lawmakers who want to expand drilling on federal lands.

On Tuesday, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., released a study showing that the National Park Service has been spending money unnecessarily while it says it can't afford to pay for a massive backlog of maintenance project at the national parks. Trails at the Grand Canyon are in disrepair, and water at Yellowstone is pouring out of old pipes, for example.

Still, Jewell argued drilling coveted by Republicans and some centrist Democrats could coexist with conservation, issuing an order Thursday that aims to strike a "balance" between the two.

The move calls for a department-wide strategy to mitigate environmental conflict arising from resource development, which she said would help preserve federal lands while shielding businesses from potentially damaging environmental conflicts.

"Under my leadership at Interior, we will always take the long view. And we will always, always keep in mind that public lands are a trust, one that we manage for generations to come," Jewell said.

The plan calls for identifying environmental issues during the permitting process, while also establishing plans for land restoration and adaptation.

She promoted the development policy she rolled out Thursday as a way to minimize backlash and lawsuits against businesses for potential environmental damage.

"Project proponents will be able to invest with certainty and clarity in their projects and support the region's environmental needs rather than ad-hoc, project-by-project mitigation efforts," she said.

Jewell said there's room for Republicans to support conservation, calling national parks an "economic engine" for the communities.

She implored Congress to maintain funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund — which uses revenues from offshore oil and gas development to enhance parks and open spaces.

President Obama recommended making that $900 million authorization permanent in his fiscal 2014 budget. But House Republicans pushed and passed an Interior budget that zeroes out that fund.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: agenda21; deptofinterior; dictatorship; environment; epa; federalland; fedlandgrab; jobs; obama; obamalegacy; obamunism; oil; un; unagenda21
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 10/31/2013 1:36:17 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

He’s your typical thief.


2 posted on 10/31/2013 1:37:44 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Have you had your ObamaCare Marketplace shopping experience today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Choom is just grabbing more land for agenda 21.


3 posted on 10/31/2013 1:37:49 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Then repeal the Antiquities Act, problem solved.


4 posted on 10/31/2013 1:40:45 PM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The shutdown

Yep.

5 posted on 10/31/2013 1:41:32 PM PDT by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
UN Agenda 21 at work to outlaw private property... except for the ruling class.
6 posted on 10/31/2013 1:44:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Yet more proof that foreigners don’t belong in our government.

Jewell is British, and grew up during the imposition of British Socialism on those formerly great people.

She’s also obviously never ditched the idea that we don’t have Monarchs in the U.S. and the President is bound by laws, he doesn’t make them.

But then he’s just as foreign as she is, so what would we expect?


7 posted on 10/31/2013 1:53:01 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The U.S. is managing to still produce oil despite the Obama administration’s roadblocks. So now they’ll just ‘nationalize’ the state and private land and take it and prohibit any oil exploration or drilling.

And some here think that Obama doesn’t work for the Saudi’s.


8 posted on 10/31/2013 1:55:07 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“calling national parks an “economic engine” “

Let’s just declare all 57 states a giant national park.

Then we will have economic recovery!!

What am I missing?


9 posted on 10/31/2013 1:57:39 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob ( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Will he get a kick-back for it — like Clinton got from the Riadys for the Utah coal grab?


10 posted on 10/31/2013 2:15:01 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; All

It seems to me that if land needs to be protected, from poachers for example, then the feds shouldn’t be able to buy the land for public use.

Insights?


11 posted on 10/31/2013 2:20:58 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This is a major issue for conservative politicians when next the Republicans are in power.

Not only must they stop such presidential land grabs, and prohibit them in the future, but there is a vast amount of land, especially in the west, that needs to be returned to the states.

Doing so will enrage the Democrats, because it will first of all cripple Agenda 21. Second because it will make a lot of Interior Department personnel redundant. And third, because it would be the opening salvo in stripping power from the EPA and other oppressive government agencies.


12 posted on 10/31/2013 2:59:39 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Welfare is the new euphemism for Eugenics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Ironic coming from a President who won’t be going to Gettysburg on the 150th anniversary of Lincoln’s Gettysburg address. Jewell will ‘represent’ him..

http://blog.pennlive.com/gettysburg-150/2013/10/obama_chickens_out_skips_getty.html


13 posted on 10/31/2013 3:16:18 PM PDT by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

O man just needs more things to shut down in the next shutdown.


14 posted on 10/31/2013 3:25:21 PM PDT by BCable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Yet more proof that foreigners don’t belong in our government.

Jewell is British, and grew up during the imposition of British Socialism on those formerly great people.

She’s also obviously never ditched the idea that we don’t have Monarchs in the U.S. and the President is bound by laws, he doesn’t make them.

But then he’s just as foreign as she is, so what would we expect?


She left at age 4 when her doctor father moved to the US.

It's a bit hard to pin “being foreign” on her...:^)

She's still doing a poor job though.

15 posted on 10/31/2013 3:30:23 PM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: az_gila

Maybe. But she’s not your typical Interior Secretary material.


16 posted on 10/31/2013 3:34:56 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Federal parks are usually located where there would be an attraction even if not a federal park.

It is the fact that they are federal, and thus subject to closure, and not subject to local development, that makes the local communities suffer.


17 posted on 10/31/2013 3:49:51 PM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar will soon be repeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

EOs can be nullified by the next president or, if we had a real house of representatives it could be defunded. No EO is permanent unless we let it be.


18 posted on 10/31/2013 3:52:20 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Jewell said there's room for Republicans to support conservation, calling national parks an "economic engine" for the communities.

Three problems here: first, notice how monument morphs into park; second, Jewell conflates conservation with locking resource development and multi-use out of these properties; third, this red herring of federal land closures being an economic engine.

My county is about the size of Connecticut. We are infested with alphabet agencies composed almost exclusively of radical green weenies – BLM, USFWS, USFS, and EPA, to name a few.

The BLM regularly posts water holes just before archery antelope season. Good luck getting close to an animal. Too bad you shelled out thousands of dollars getting here, hiring a guide, and so on. Be on your way, citizen.

USFWS, with the help of commies and rinos in state government back east, designated the local river as a national refuge for squawfish. This is a trash fish that pays cash bounties in other states. To protect the squawfish, all the pike were removed from a river that previously was one of the top three pike sport fishing destinations in the world. Everyone wanted a chance at a 50-pound trophy. Those people are now spending their money elsewhere. Nobody pays for a squawfish photo safari.

USFWS, along with their fellow travelers at Colorado DOW and sinapu, visit to tell us how wonderful it will be when the Yellowstone wolves finally make it down here. Not to worry fellows, their preferred food is elk, not cows. You’d think these world experts on everything just might know the economic impact of elk hunters to a ranch – as in their largest single source of cash each year. Or not.

I want to stress this in no uncertain terms: NO ECO-TOURIST HAS EVER SPENT A NICKLE IN OUR BUSINESS. EVER. On the other hand, hunters, fishermen, miners, ranchers, drillers, roughnecks – I could go on but I think you know where I’m going – have kept us alive for over twenty years. Economic engine? More like economic terrorism.

19 posted on 10/31/2013 4:08:19 PM PDT by kitchen (Even the walls have ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Obama puts the dick in Dictator.


20 posted on 10/31/2013 5:14:39 PM PDT by Flick Lives (The U.S. is dead to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson