Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joshua c

Subscribers pay a monthly fee for the channels, its part of the bill.

Better to not have cable, IMO.


21 posted on 10/24/2013 7:58:39 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL
I would, but then I would have nothing to watch on TV. I live in between DC and Richmond. I can get locals over the air for both markets, 24/7 praise for Obama no thank you. Other then a couple of shows on Tuesday we don't watch network TV. I can block all the channels we don't watch.

I would rather just pay for the channels I do watch, but I don't see that idea ever happening. It would be interesting to see how fast the quality of TV were to change if people could "subscribe" and only pay for the TV they wanted to watch.

It would be nice to just get the shows you wanted to watch vice the whole network, you can but you have to stream it off the internet and you can't always do that for every show.

I have to pay extra if I want the "adult" channels. ( I don't) I shouldn't have to pay for the disney channels I don't want, or the 24/7 rap music channels, etc...

32 posted on 10/24/2013 8:45:10 AM PDT by DYngbld (I have read the back of the Book and we WIN!!!! (this post approved by the NSA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson