Posted on 10/21/2013 12:01:33 PM PDT by jimbo123
Well, she was also eulogizing Chis Christie, New Jersey’s homegrown RINO as VP or Presidential material.
I think Coulter needs to join George Will and Paul Mushine and Krauthammer as “conservatives” conservatives really don’t need.
I dont think Coulter attacked his time in congress.
She attacked his amnesty support and his presidential run.
I think Coulter is wrong on Mike Castle and Christine O’Donnell. Mike Castle was only 50/50 to win the Senate seat.
When Joe Miller, O’Donnell, Angle, Rubio and Paul took out establishment figures it scared the RINOs into blocking the Dream Act. At the time all of them were against amnesty.
Only Bennett, Murkowski and Lugar voted for the Dream Act in 2010. The McCainiacs helped block the Dream Act.
Coulter is wrong on Lugar. It is good that Lugar is gone regardless. I hope Donnelly and Coats see out their terms long enough to stop Lugar coming back. I wouldnt put it passed Dan Coats to retire early and get Lugar back.
She was wrong about Christie. She’s right about many other things. If you believe that she’s lost credibility because of Christie, that means her writings are not credible as well, which is illogical.
Take a look at our political environment. Although it may be personally satisfying to you, is trashing Ann Coulter a wise political move? The liberals don’t like AC either. What’s that tell you?
Those are good points, but I have watched her for a long time.
Initially I thought she was great, but now I think she just wants to be outrageous and sell her books.
Its like she goes out of her way to say really outrageous things - not just about the left - which is fine - but about conservatives. Her trashing people like Gingrich is far worse than me trashing her. As a matter of fact, her “idol” Christie, accused Gingrich of being a crook in no uncertain terms during the primary.
I can’t agree with your idea that her behavior is from her desire to sell books. It doesn’t make sense to me. In the long run content sells books, not anger.
I read her as being as mad as I am....spitting mad. She’s researched her subjects well and is passionate about defeating Democrats. Why wouldn’t she be mad?
For what it’s worth, I give her her due. She was wrong about Christie. But she’s dead-on right about the corrupt Democrats who manipulate the minds of the simple voters. I’m happy she’s on our side.
She certainly wasn’t right about Gingrich either. Had he been nominated, perhaps the Marxist would not be in office today.
No Way. Nobody could beat Obama’s team of payoffs and press. If he were white, Newt would have stood some chance. As is, No Way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.