Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Obamacare Will Shrink the Labor Supply (freeloaders jazzed)
National Review ^ | 10/14/13 | Veronique de Rugy

Posted on 10/14/2013 2:38:30 PM PDT by Libloather

Under the Affordable Care Act, someone making less than 138 percent of the poverty line qualifies for Medicaid, and someone between 138 and 400 percent of the poverty line is qualified to receive a federal tax subsidy for health insurance bought on a government exchange. But here is the problem: premiums will rise for millions of Americans because of requirements that policies provide certain benefits that they didn’t offer before. This means plenty of people will now have a pricier plan, and no way to defray the cost. My colleague Chuck Blahous sends me this piece from SFGate that gives an example of what that could look like for many families:

**SNIP**

This new plan, Kaiser’s cheapest offering for 2014, would consume about 25 percent of their after-tax income. The new plan still has a $5,000 deductible but provides coverage for things her current policy does not, such as maternity care, healthy child visits and coverage for dependents up to age 26. Proctor has no use for such coverage, since her son is 30.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; freeloaders; husseincare; labor; obamacare; obamacaresubsidies; parttimejobs; unemployment
You can also consider reducing your 2014 income by working just a bit less.

All part of the master plan.

1 posted on 10/14/2013 2:38:30 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
But ObamaCare NAVIGATORS will have jobs....possibly work from jail.
2 posted on 10/14/2013 2:43:00 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“would consume 25% of after tax income”

It’s almost like submitting a credit card debt to judgment. If your credit rate is 20% and the judgment interest rate is (say) 8% you come out 12 points ahead.
The most they can garnish of your income is 25%. So if you were a young person it would cost you less money to pay the penalty, let the hospital sue you for a catastrophic illness /injury, then enter into voluntary garnishment.


3 posted on 10/14/2013 3:24:52 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Exactly.

Delaying the business mandate (while enforcing the individual mandate) is the regime’s tactic for making businesses dump their workers’ health coverage.

The planned to do this all along. This Zerocare is just a stepping stone to a single-payer NHS-like system.


4 posted on 10/14/2013 3:31:34 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Impeach We Much!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

What Obama is really doing (though Obamacare and other things) is pushing companies to have the bulk of their employees outside the United States. The fewer American employees, the fewer regulation they will have to contend with. Are our leaders really so blind to this?


5 posted on 10/14/2013 3:59:52 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson