To: expat2
I wouldn’t give Chamberlain that credit, because in the negotiations he was weak and ineffectual, but on his return home bragged of how effective he had been in containing Hitler.
Nobody believed him then, and we should question apologists for him now.
24 posted on
10/11/2013 7:42:04 AM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(The best War on Terror News is at rantburg.com)
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
The problem was he had no leverage -- to declare war would have been a total disaster. If you have no leverage, you cannot negotiate with an intelligent person and appear anything but weak.
He bragged about because (a) he wanted to place Hitler's promises firmly on the record re casus belli(/i> for the next time, (b) he was a politician, and they invariably put on spin. However, he clearly wasn't taken in because aircraft and armaments production was vastly increased when he came back.
46 posted on
10/11/2013 11:16:27 AM PDT by
expat2
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
The problem was he had no leverage -- to declare war would have been a total disaster. If you have no leverage, you cannot negotiate with an intelligent person and appear anything but weak.
He bragged about it because (a) he wanted to place Hitler's promises firmly on the record re casus belli for the next time, (b) he was a politician, and they invariably put on spin. However, he clearly wasn't taken in because aircraft and armaments production was vastly increased when he came back.
47 posted on
10/11/2013 11:17:35 AM PDT by
expat2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson