Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donmeaker

Which was a fancy analytic way of saying that the natural factors which vie and combine to define the “global temperature” (if we can agree on what that means as a single number, kind of like defining a person’s mind with a single number IQ) are vastly larger than what puny man can do. In fact paradoxical effects are possible; “Mother Nature” may “decide” to meet all this “greenhouse gas” with nods towards a new ice age. These silly slyentists are treating the system as though it were nicely contained in a laboratory chamber, and not roaring with chaos!


11 posted on 10/10/2013 6:55:52 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

Lorenz’s study was of a simplified system, and still even that could not be predicted.

he eventually made an even more simple math model, a system of three equations (retaining the nonlinearity).

Graphing it gives the famous Lorenz butterfly.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Lorenz+butterfly&qs=n&form=QBIR&pq=lorenz+butterfly&sc=5-16&sp=-1&sk=#view=detail&id=7E5136533364163E3EE6845E76D3935C06B4DA48&selectedIndex=0


12 posted on 10/10/2013 7:04:09 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson