Posted on 09/30/2013 3:57:38 PM PDT by Viennacon
Let’s get every name up here on FR.
Six voted no. Who is the Peter King coalition? Just to keep on file ;)
Thanks!
What say we make this the Live Thread?
Let’s start that conversation by acknowledging we aren’t going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants... bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society. Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors. [but he’s not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]
...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.
Are you sure? Fox is displaying the floor vote and has 30 Nay Repuke votes. But that can’t be right.
that’s the one.....
Let me guess. Does Diebold do the vote tabulation for Congress?
Said 5(?) Reps including Bachmann and Gohmert voted against the rule? What is going on?
I;m not sure what’s going on. Switching to CSPAN now.
quisling...the perfect one word comment to send to a Rep....perfect
They remind me of the Vichy French whores who screwed the German occupiers. Peter King should have his hair piece removed and forced to march past us in shame while we throw rotten fruit at him. That is just for starters.
Sorry. But how? People say, "vote the bums out." But when you say lets vote them all out, everyone says, "well I did not mean my rep, he/she is a good guy/gal, votes for conservative stuff, yada yada yada." With this attitude every stinking one of them will always remain in office. People rarely vote their reps out. Sure, a few get tossed each year, but most of these people are in office and have been for many years. They are going no where. So, the beat goes on. The same ole, same ole. Once in side the beltway, the bums are in another world. Their world. Where THEY control their salary, their pension, their healthcare, their bennies, etc. And we, the people, the employer of these bums, have no say so over all this list of things. And WE have to have OUR EMPLOYEE in the House/Senate vote on what THEY will decide that WE, the tax paying public, will receive and how much. So, where else does the EMPLOYEE CONTROL EVERYTHING OVER THE EMPLOYER AND I MEAN EVERYTHING STINKING THING!!!!!
Love the keywords for this thread...
I just heard only 6 voted against the Pubs.
At least we know 6 Pubs that need a primary opponent. This lack of discipline is why I only contribute directly to candidates. I will not help these people destroy me.
That cannot be the same vote. Grimm would definitely be on such a list. Do you have any links?
I woke up very early this morning, and heard someone on the radio explaining the “gridlock” in congress - specifically the house-
Gerrymanding has given these elected fools security, so they need not worry about the “base” in elections. The only way to take them on is in the primaries, and that is a hard road, considering the way their districts have been “gerrymandered”.
Made sense in my stupor upon awakening. What do you all think?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.