Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Dept. challenges 'extremely aggressive' NC voting restrictions
thehill.com ^ | September 30, 2013 | Ben Goad

Posted on 09/30/2013 11:33:22 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

The Justice Department sued North Carolina Monday in the latest salvo in the Obama administration's ongoing battle against restrictive state voting regulations.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in the Middle District of North Carolina, seeks to topple provisions of a new statute that reduce early voting access and require North Carolinians to show photo identification before they are allowed to vote.

"The state legislature took extremely aggressive steps to curtail the voting rights of African-Americans," Attorney General Eric Holder said during a news conference at the agency's headquarters.

In the last election cycle, more than 70 percent of black voters in North Carolina cast their ballots during the early voting period, Holder said.

Proponents of such laws contend they are needed to prevent voter fraud, an assertion Holder brushed off as "not real."

"We will show that these are discriminatory, both in intent and impact," Holder said.

The DOJ is also asking the court to reinstate a requirement that the agency sign off on any changes to election procedures in North Carolina and other states with histories of discrimination.

The lawsuit follows a major defeat this summer in the administration's efforts.

In June, a divided Supreme Court struck down the Voting Rights Act's provision requiring states to obtain federal preclearance before tightening voting rules.

Officials from the North Carolina attorney general's office could not immediately be reached for comment.


TOPICS: Front Page News; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: democrats; democratvoterfraud; doj; dojisajoke; electionfraud; elections; govtabuse; holder; obama; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 09/30/2013 11:33:22 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Unless he can prove that Black people don’t come out in photos then he loses.


2 posted on 09/30/2013 11:35:32 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Is Holder suggesting that His People are too stupid, lazy and incompetent to get themselves some photo ID?

Who’s the racist again?


3 posted on 09/30/2013 11:36:12 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

so, if voting is a right, free of obligation to prove ones eligibility, will folks be required to provide ID when accessing their “right” to govt. healthcare should ACA become fully implemented?


4 posted on 09/30/2013 11:37:07 AM PDT by sappy (criminaldems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Hey eric ... gfy ... !

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

5 posted on 09/30/2013 11:38:14 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Number the ballots and make the ‘voter’ show a valid ID before getting ‘only one ballot.’ Yeah...that’s discriminatory to blacks.


6 posted on 09/30/2013 11:39:02 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Producing photo-id is an extremely aggressive step to curtail the voting rights of African-Americans?

What about Asian-Americans? Or Hispanic-Americans? Or European-Americans? Or any other hyphenated American? Does requiring a photo-id curtail their right?

And just how exactly is a photo-id a curtailment of a right?

Holder is a JOKE.


7 posted on 09/30/2013 11:43:59 AM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I heard on NPR this morning that they don’t really expect this Federal lawsuit to succeed. In order to win the feds will have to prove intentional discrimination on the part of legislators, and that’s a very high bar to get over.


8 posted on 09/30/2013 11:47:47 AM PDT by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus

He knows that the full SCOTUS appeals process will drag out past Nov. 2016.


9 posted on 09/30/2013 11:48:21 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Gotta protect vote Fraud. It is how they win elections.


10 posted on 09/30/2013 11:50:18 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I wonder what percentage of the Black population doesn’t have a state ID or DL? Do they not have it as a form of struggle/protest against The Man?


11 posted on 09/30/2013 11:51:17 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (I’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Perhaps Mr. Boehner and Mr. Issa can explain why this anti-American creep is still the Attorney General.

They had a chance to dump him this summer.

Nothing happened.

Are they depending on Lois Lerner to roll over?

Doesn't matter. They have enough with that and all the other abominations this Black Nationalist perpertrated.

Get with it and dump him.

12 posted on 09/30/2013 11:55:11 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

They all have IDs, they just don’t want to show it when they are voting under another name.


13 posted on 09/30/2013 11:55:16 AM PDT by AdSimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Yah,and the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTengages in "extremely aggressive" practices when it require me to show an ID at my local CVS when buying my over-the-counter allergy medicine...a drug deemed to be so harmless that it doesn't even require a physician's prescription.
14 posted on 09/30/2013 11:55:17 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Osama Obama Care: A Religion That Will Have You On Your Knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Unless he can prove that Black people don’t come out in photos then he loses.

What if the photos are underexposed? /S

15 posted on 09/30/2013 12:02:57 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
A few months ago I went to our Town Hall to cast an absentee ballot in the upcoming Senate election (which,of course,the worthless psychopath Maoist candidate won).While waiting for her to look something up I asked if she needed my ID...she said no.I asked her why not and she said that state law forbids asking for ID in a situation like mine.I then asked her if people who are registering for the first time to vote in the town are required to show any kind of proof of US citizenship.She said "no",state law also forbids requiring such proof.

That's Massachusetts for ya.

16 posted on 09/30/2013 12:03:18 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Osama Obama Care: A Religion That Will Have You On Your Knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

1:36 Minutes
GOP Rep.: DOJ Prosecuting North Carolina over ‘Hypothetical Situation’ of Voter Disenfranchisement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kds30iHikyU

N Carolina Voter ID Press conference
Governor of N Carolina
4:42 Minutes
McCrory: Lawsuit ‘Without Merit’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=but_9oy0pWc


17 posted on 09/30/2013 12:13:14 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

do you need an ID to sign up for welfare?


18 posted on 09/30/2013 12:14:02 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Most places I think they aks....but if you have another welfare something that have your name on it, you’re in like Flint....


19 posted on 09/30/2013 12:16:20 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
That's Massachusetts for ya.

That's why NC passed the law. NC had basically the same law and it encouraged voter fraud which the vote fraudsters take full advantage of. Everybody knew it, but nothing could be done about it until we elected a Republican Senate and Legislature and in 2012 a Republican Governor.

Starting with the implementation of the law in 2016, it will be twice as tough to win as a Democrat as this cancels out many of their fraudulent votes - unless you count the voting machine fraud, which happened in 2012, on the Presidential ballot line (all in Obama's favor, but fortunately just short of "enough" to swing NC into the Obama camp).

Now that the jig is up (pun intended), Holder wants to shut down the new safeguards. The slimy rat should be prosecuted for subornation of voter fraud and wasting taxpayer monies on frivolous lawsuits.

20 posted on 09/30/2013 12:24:16 PM PDT by Gritty (We are quickly running out of "boxes"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson