Skip to comments.Congress: Hillary’s Benghazi Investigation Let Top Officials Escape Blame
Posted on 09/15/2013 4:43:15 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
A new report reveals that the State Departments Benghazi investigation failed to hold senior officials accountable for the deaths of four Americans. Josh Rogin reports.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
But they keep getting by with it. Come on Issa. Come on Court that has the Fast & Furious subpena case. Come on something.
We know damn well the media will not give out a peep.
And that GD Elijah Cummings keeps up with his blasting his committee for being politically partisan
Nixon went downs due to swarming, biased media and turncoat Sen Howard Baker. We need a Dem to break ranks. Any Dem will do.
The Marxist Kenyan needs to be impeached and the witch named Rodham Clinton needs to be kept as far from the White House as humanly possible.
The report was designed to find no one responsible !
The select committee was hand-chosen by Hillary so that it's determination would be muddied !
What are we waiting for ,..2014 ?
Abandonment ,dereliction of duty , and abandoning your post are punishable offenses in any military or civil government duty
The fact that Cummings is Partisan is a given ,.. a known !
He is still trying to close the curtain to the puppetmaster of OZ !
"four mid-level officials"
Yeah , always blame the 'underlings '
Sorta like the IRS blameing the Cinncinatti folks
ALL Bull. $hit . !!
I'm not sure whether or not these 4 are appointees but as part of the process Issa first has to impugn the investigative report which means he has to impugn those responsible for overseeing the report, the two highest level careerists, Amb Pickering and Admiral Mullen.
The problem with this is that Pickering is held in higher esteem than Issa.
Which brings into issue Pickering's testimony to the committee. Issa wanted Pickering to testify behind closed doors and Pickering was insisting on testifying publicly. In the end, Issa threatened Pickering with a subpoena and Pickering agreed to testify behind closed doors.
Issa tells the press that he wants the private testimony because he is concerned that some of it might be classified, and that he(Issa) will conduct a second public interview of Pickering..
Of course he didn't have the second public interview of Pickering and everybody knows why. He wanted to edit Pickering's testimony so that he(Issa) could select what part of it would be made public.
Which explains why the general public is ignoring Issa.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.