Yes, she claims she was "naive" about the Kagans, which is laughable at best. How is it even remotely possible that she was unaware of Robert Kagan/Victoria Nuland? She was apparently high up enough on the ISW food chain to be chosen as a public face for them but not privy to what would be the equivalent of water-cooler chat about Kagan and Nuland?
And Kim Kagan, hailed as a super-researcher herself, was duped by O'Bagy's claim the she had been awarded her doctorate. Just took her word for it, don'tcha know.
What a nest of vipers.
Victoria Nuland attended Brown University (nwo), and married Robert Kagan, who attended Yale like his father Donald.
Nuland’s father, however, also attended Yale.
This puts Victoria up pretty high on the “Yale scale” of new world order, since she’s a Yale child herself and also married a Yale child. This is why she can work at a high level State Department job. Such jobs are reserved for only people considered reliable by new world order (that is, they will cover up anything necessary), so mostly this means at least 2nd generation new world order operatives.
O’Bagy, with her lies about her PhD, is just starting out in her new world order career. She can be used, then, to write lies about something like Syria.
Hawks in Congress used her writings to push for attacking Syria.
Because O’Bagy has her resume lie hanging over her head, she is controllable. And if O’Bagy’s writings get found out as lies, she could simply be outed for lying about her PhD, as she was, which deflects all criticism of Congressmen and the Kagans and their propaganda firm, this “War Institute”, dumps all the criticism on the expendable O’Bagy, who “takes one for the team”.
The “reputation” amongst DC elites and the presss of this “Institute for the Study of War” and the Kagans is what is to be maintained, which is easily done by ditching O’Bagy at this moment. She can be “recycled” and go to work elsewhere and be used again years down the road once these news stories age, but for now she’s “on the bench”.