Identify the students and reply appropriately.
We should create a fund to help leftists like this permanently emigrate to a country which reflects their values. Perhaps Russia, Cuba, China, or Iran would be more suitable for these ‘enlightened’ America-haters.
We have to realize that 9.11 wasn’t solely the work of Osama bin Laden, nut also of his muslim cohorts everywhere, and of Democrats like Obama as well as all the leftist organizations.
There is more and more evidence that Obama himself indeed was part of the attack.
I certainly wouldn’t have let them walk off with my flags in a plastic trash bag.
That’s called theft. Charge them with it.
In reality it was time to open a can of Whoop-ass.
In case anyone wants to take bike ride there.
Doesn’t anyone up there have any balls? This story SHOULD be about 5 vicious beatings instead.
So they are using the old “sacred Indian burial grounds” claim again?
No punishment either, it appears. I'll bet there would have been hell to pay if they were Democrat political signs instead of American flags.
If they were so worried about sacred Indian burial grounds, why where they walking on it? Did no one have the back bone to take those flags from them, re plant them and stand guard? Where was the college discipline officer and when will they be suspended?
Imperialism? Where the HELL is this “empire”?
he college I almost went to, but didn’t.
The campus is beautiful. The student’s, not so much.
Abenaki?
They sure?
The sad part about this is that Americans have been brutally conditioned that they cannot, *must* not, *ever* resort to violence in the face of such offensive, heinous vandalism directed against the sacred.
It does not matter if the filth desecrate a church or a funeral or a cemetery, if they attack public speakers at the podium to shut them up and deny them their rights, if they assault people because of their race, or how they look, or what they wear or because they are military personnel or veterans, or for no reason at all.
You cannot, *must* not, *ever* resort to violence against such people. Why is that? I reject this restraint on good citizens.
Imagine what would have happened had a group of real men and women waded into that group of vandals and proceeded to give them a thumping. Literally to give them a “beating”. To leave them injured and mournful and afraid of spontaneous punishment for their vile behavior in the future.
While that might sound like a “radical” solution, I compare it to the right to self-defense.
THE SAME PEOPLE who insist that you cannot, *must* not, *ever* resort to violence against such people, are THE SAME PEOPLE who say that you should NEVER, EVER protect or defend yourself and your family with a gun against a violent criminal, that you should “leave it up to the police.”
They are THE SAME PEOPLE who insist that desecrating the flag is “free speech”; that Christian crosses to commemorate the dead are a “violation of church and state”; that schoolchildren must learn about homosexuality and Islam, but nothing about Christianity, etc., ad nauseum.
Reject their perverted paradigm.
If you see some disgusting individual committing an offensive act, and you are *able* to stop them, even with violence, you SHOULD do so.
Yes, you may get arrested for thrashing them. But you must have confidence in your peers who sit on the jury that they will agree with your justification. That they will reject punishing you for standing up for what is good and righteous. And that the idea of jury nullification will not be lost on them. And in doing so, they will join with you in condemning what the real offenders did.
And encouraging others to stand up for what is good and righteous, in the face of those who would demean and destroy it.
I miss the good ol’ days when fools would have gotten their asses whipped for doing this.......
Things like this make me glad I’ve already graduated. There would’ve been some very harsh words said to these people had I been there.