Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/11/2013 11:33:07 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: markomalley

PPP should be PPPP for piss poor partisan poll.


2 posted on 09/11/2013 11:35:09 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Public Policy Polling (PPP): Publishing all the polls that fit our political bias!


3 posted on 09/11/2013 11:35:12 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Why haven't we heard from the 30 Benghazi survivors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The PPP polls are quite good if my understanding is correct, and so I’m not buying the lame excuse that PPP decided not to release this once since not consistent with Obama’s re-election last fall. What does the one have to do with the other, other than that I smell a RAT? PPP may have just blown its credibility.


4 posted on 09/11/2013 11:35:51 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

So...

An opportunity for the single biggest boost to their credibility came up, and they DIDN’T TRUST THEIR OWN POLLING DATA!!!

Good move.


5 posted on 09/11/2013 11:36:25 AM PDT by Mr. K (Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

They witheld their data because they knew it would weaken the cries of “Voter suppression” by the Dim-o-bulbs...


6 posted on 09/11/2013 11:39:36 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Mr. Jensen either doesn’t have much confidence in his own polls (which calls into question their methodology and accuracy) or values his own opinion/view above his own polls (which is another problem altogether). Both are very problematic for him. However, the real story is probably that he didn’t want to release the poll for fear of encouraging the pro-gun movement.


7 posted on 09/11/2013 11:39:51 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Maybe just as well not to publish it while voting was going on because it may have suppressed the recall vote with those that maybe deciding to stay home if it appeared that the recall would be successful.


8 posted on 09/11/2013 11:40:52 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
The coverup continues. This morning's Denver Post reported that Morse had conceded and Giron was "trailing" but gave NO vote numbers or percentages. I have never before read coverage of an election that did not report the vote.

They know this was a disaster for Democrats. Giron's district is heavily Democrat and Morse only got close because of massive vote fraud by Colorado College students.

10 posted on 09/11/2013 11:41:30 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

It was a poorly disguised effort to influence the vote in favor of the democrats but it backfired.


11 posted on 09/11/2013 11:42:57 AM PDT by Iron Munro ("You bring me the man, I'll find you the crime" - Lavrentiy Beria [and Eric Holder])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Of course, if the poll results were exactly the opposite they would have also withheld it. /s
12 posted on 09/11/2013 11:43:28 AM PDT by JPG (Putin Does Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
But the NRA won the messaging game and turned it into something bigger than it was — even if that wasn’t true

Bull chips! The NRA follows gun owners not the other way around. We, the people of CO, reject your commie vision of our state!

16 posted on 09/11/2013 11:51:55 AM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
PPP marketing hook: "Even we don't believe us."
18 posted on 09/11/2013 11:54:09 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Don't twerk me, Bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

“in a district that Barack Obama won by almost 20 points, I figured there was no way that could be right and made a rare decision not to release the poll.”

He is, of course, assuming BHO REALLY did legitimately win by 20 points, which could be the fatal flaw in his polling data.


19 posted on 09/11/2013 11:54:48 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
The reason, according to PPP pollster Tom Jensen, was that “in a district that Barack Obama won by almost 20 points, I figured there was no way that could be right and made a rare decision not to release the poll.”

No, there was no voter fraud in 2012.(/sarcasm) A 32% swing in less than a year? I'm sorry, but that simply does not pass the smell test. No person that voted for Obama in 2012 is going to be against gun control less than a year later. This woman should have won easily, but she was removed with great prejudice.

20 posted on 09/11/2013 11:55:56 AM PDT by Major Matt Mason ("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

In other words, PPP withheld the poll because it might discourage Democrats.


21 posted on 09/11/2013 11:58:00 AM PDT by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The thing that struck me about the results of this election Is how upside down the results were, with the other DemonCrap losing by only 2 percentage points, while this witch lost by about 12. Then it struck me. The DemonCraps, thinking the witch would win on her own, directed all their election theft efforts into the other race, which they still lost, but only because the honest votes were so heavily against them that it was impossible to steal the election.


22 posted on 09/11/2013 11:58:29 AM PDT by libstripper (])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Interestingly, the poll also found 68 percent supporting background checks...


The polls never make it clear that there are already background checks for all purchases through gun dealers, so many who say they “approve” are approving of the status quo in their own minds.


23 posted on 09/11/2013 12:03:01 PM PDT by Founding Nephew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; mhking
The reason, according to PPP pollster Tom Jensen, was that “in a district that Barack Obama won by almost 20 points, I figured there was no way that could be right and made a rare decision not to release the poll.”

Just d-mn!

24 posted on 09/11/2013 12:04:34 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

There is probably some chance that the opportunity to “pull the flush handle on ANY politician” padded these numbers a bit.


26 posted on 09/11/2013 12:15:42 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
The reason, according to PPP pollster Tom Jensen, was that “in a district that Barack Obama won by almost 20 points, I figured there was no way that could be right and made a rare decision not to release the poll

I seriously doubt that this is a rare decision. PPP has just lost any credibility it ever had. I have long maintained that polls are selectively released to appease political or financial interests. If CBS commissions a poll, they will get the best results (from CBS' perspective) possible. Stuff like this just confirms my suspicions about this.

29 posted on 09/11/2013 12:16:47 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson