Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PPP admits hiding Colorado recall poll
Washington Examiner ^ | 9/11/2013

Posted on 09/11/2013 11:33:07 AM PDT by markomalley

A spokesman for Public Policy Polling admitted Wednesday to withholding a poll showing Colorado voters were going to recall State Sen. Angela Giron by a 12-point margin.

The reason, according to PPP pollster Tom Jensen, was that “in a district that Barack Obama won by almost 20 points, I figured there was no way that could be right and made a rare decision not to release the poll.”

When the votes were counted in race, the poll turned out to be on target, as Giron lost by 12 points. “We should have had more faith in our numbers,” Jensen said.

Interestingly, the poll also found 68 percent supporting background checks and an evenly split on a law limiting high capacity ammunition magazines.

The poll also found 53 percent of voters approved of the National Rifle Association.

One might think that Giron's stances on gun control would produce a different result in an overwhelmingly Democratic district, but Jensen pointed to the factor that made the difference:

But the NRA won the messaging game and turned it into something bigger than it was — even if that wasn’t true — and Giron paid the price.



TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: guncontrol; ppp4obama; ppp4obamaagenda; pppfraud; secondamendment; typicalpppflack; voterfraud; votersuppression
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: markomalley

In other words, PPP withheld the poll because it might discourage Democrats.


21 posted on 09/11/2013 11:58:00 AM PDT by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The thing that struck me about the results of this election Is how upside down the results were, with the other DemonCrap losing by only 2 percentage points, while this witch lost by about 12. Then it struck me. The DemonCraps, thinking the witch would win on her own, directed all their election theft efforts into the other race, which they still lost, but only because the honest votes were so heavily against them that it was impossible to steal the election.


22 posted on 09/11/2013 11:58:29 AM PDT by libstripper (])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Interestingly, the poll also found 68 percent supporting background checks...


The polls never make it clear that there are already background checks for all purchases through gun dealers, so many who say they “approve” are approving of the status quo in their own minds.


23 posted on 09/11/2013 12:03:01 PM PDT by Founding Nephew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; mhking
The reason, according to PPP pollster Tom Jensen, was that “in a district that Barack Obama won by almost 20 points, I figured there was no way that could be right and made a rare decision not to release the poll.”

Just d-mn!

24 posted on 09/11/2013 12:04:34 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Bingo.


25 posted on 09/11/2013 12:13:09 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

There is probably some chance that the opportunity to “pull the flush handle on ANY politician” padded these numbers a bit.


26 posted on 09/11/2013 12:15:42 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Why did they list Connecticut twice?


27 posted on 09/11/2013 12:15:48 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Stosh

rofl


28 posted on 09/11/2013 12:16:31 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
The reason, according to PPP pollster Tom Jensen, was that “in a district that Barack Obama won by almost 20 points, I figured there was no way that could be right and made a rare decision not to release the poll

I seriously doubt that this is a rare decision. PPP has just lost any credibility it ever had. I have long maintained that polls are selectively released to appease political or financial interests. If CBS commissions a poll, they will get the best results (from CBS' perspective) possible. Stuff like this just confirms my suspicions about this.

29 posted on 09/11/2013 12:16:47 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
As the Dem's are saying, “Voter suppression, pure and simple!” NOT!

So I wonder if the MSM is going to pick up on this as a major story that it was known what was going to happen, but nobody wanted to admit the truth until their nose was rubbed in it?

Liberalism, a delusion of the worst order.

30 posted on 09/11/2013 12:20:31 PM PDT by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
The reason, according to PPP pollster Tom Jensen, was that “in a district that Barack Obama won by almost 20 points, I figured there was no way that could be right and made a rare decision not to release the poll.”

No.
The reason is that Obama's MSM and polling groups are so accustomed to being able to force issues to conclude a certain way, that they refused to believe it didn't work this time!

Time to find a new job, useless losers!

31 posted on 09/11/2013 12:23:53 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Background checks, permits, limits on magazines are all violations of the Second Amendment. “Shall not be infringed” is not a set of weasel words that can be reinterpreted into something else. It’s a command that government keep its hands off the right - not privilege - of all citizens to keep and bear arms. I don’t care if a person is a 10-time felon, they still have the inalienable right to bear arms.

If this sounds like too hardline a stance for your comfort, just consider whether similar restrictions on speech would be an acceptable compromise. Government permits to speak? To believe in God? To publish one’s opinion? Those are the 1st Amendment equivalents of these offenses to the 2nd.


32 posted on 09/11/2013 12:38:00 PM PDT by thoughtomator 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Here are a few more interesting factoids that you’d think the GOP would be paying attention to:

- Giron is Hispanic, in a heavily Latino district. Turns out that Hispanic voters value their Second Amendment rights as much as any other voting bloc. Memo to all those Republican consultants looking for a way to connect with Hispanic voters.

- The successful effort was organized and funded almost entirely at the local level, with the only significant outside support from the NRA. Not surprisingly, many of those behind the recall were Tea Partiers. You’d think the GOP establishment wouldn’t be in such a hurry to jettison this critical element of their base.

But then again, the party establishment is more worried about being called racist than winning elections


33 posted on 09/11/2013 1:00:55 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
PPP marketing hook: "Even we don't believe us."

LOL!
Best post on the thread!

34 posted on 09/11/2013 1:05:37 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
But the NRA won the messaging game and turned it into something bigger than it was — even if that wasn’t true — and Giron paid the price.

The supporters of the Constitution outspent seven-to-one? Of course it is true.
35 posted on 09/11/2013 3:16:16 PM PDT by Peet (Come back with a warrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

hee hee


36 posted on 09/11/2013 3:36:57 PM PDT by Mr. K (Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; ...

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

37 posted on 09/11/2013 3:59:11 PM PDT by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I’m stealing that for my tagline.


38 posted on 09/11/2013 4:02:28 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


39 posted on 09/11/2013 4:50:32 PM PDT by Nachum (I am Breitbartacus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This was just a small sampling in Colorado. One more piece of the puzzle pointing to massive voter fraud in the 2012 elections.


40 posted on 09/11/2013 5:02:13 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson