Skip to comments.
Top Dem: Colorado losses due to
´voter suppression, pure and simple´
The Hill ^
| 9/11/13
| Jonathan Easley
Posted on 09/11/2013 7:06:44 AM PDT by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: txhurl
Just a taste of what RINOS who vote with Boner, Cantor, Ryan for AMNESTY will feel.
21
posted on
09/11/2013 7:13:41 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: Nachum
When Democrats win by one vote they immediately shut down all recounts and debate, lock the doors
and place guards around the buildings. Then declare a mandate for a socialist style Government.
But if their perceived opposition wins by a majority, they cry foul.
Voter suppression? Like the IRS is doing under the direction of the Obama regime?
One Democrat vote not cast is a crime, illegals zeroing out any American vote isn't.
They all must lose in 2014!
22
posted on
09/11/2013 7:14:14 AM PDT
by
MaxMax
(If you're not pissed off, you're not paying attention)
To: Nachum
So there I was ... locking my door to go vote and as soon as I turned around, there stood a guy in a suit and sunglasses ... stern of face ...
S'cuse me ... can I help you?, I asked
Where'ya going?, he replied
To vote
No, you're not.
Well ... I figured this is probably some joke being played on me by one of my right wing friends, so I just smiled and moved to go around him, but he sidestepped to block my way.
S'cuse me .. you're in my way
Where'ya' goin', he asked again
I already told yoou ... to VOTE!
No, you're not, he again retorted.
By this time I was pissed because if this was a joke, it was no longer funny
When I tried to muscle past him, at that moment, the doors of the black SUV I hadn't noticed until just then, burst open and two more MIBs came out with trouble on the parts of their faces I could see below dark sunglasses and I KNEW ...
I wasn't votin' for Weiner today.
I went back inside and cried.
23
posted on
09/11/2013 7:14:29 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: Nachum
He’ll have to do a lot better than that if he wants to explain the loss in light of those dems having outspent the challenger six to one, according to the report from the head of the Tea Party of Colorado
24
posted on
09/11/2013 7:14:35 AM PDT
by
stanne
To: jimbo123
Ooooh yes.... rat and Rino blood and tears taste so sweet.
25
posted on
09/11/2013 7:15:01 AM PDT
by
txhurl
('The DOG ate my homework. That homework, too. ALL my homework. OK?' - POSHITUS)
To: Nachum
So, I assume she has some sort of evidence for this, besides the fact that her side lost?
Or is this just really, really poor sportsmanship?
26
posted on
09/11/2013 7:15:06 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: Nachum
She is calling the results invalid and blaming Koch brothers and the NRA for voter suppression. This is despicable slander and she should be sued.
27
posted on
09/11/2013 7:15:44 AM PDT
by
Brooklyn Attitude
(Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
To: cuban leaf
“We know they cheated, they must have because we stacked the deck so lopsided against them it was impossible for them to win” - what she really meant
28
posted on
09/11/2013 7:16:06 AM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Nachum
It had nothing to do with voter suppression. It was all because of global warming...
29
posted on
09/11/2013 7:16:32 AM PDT
by
Qbert
("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
To: SpeakerToAnimals
The Republican Party opposed the recalls, says a lot. I wonder if they will support the effort to invalidate the election?
30
posted on
09/11/2013 7:16:56 AM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Red in Blue PA
So then she is FOR voter ID. Right? Yeah, right.
To a demonicrat, combating voter suppression means preventing service members from voting.
31
posted on
09/11/2013 7:17:20 AM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: US Navy Vet
Would SOMEONE PLEASE COLD-COCK this BITCH right in the mouth! Obviously somebody already did and this is what we're left with.
32
posted on
09/11/2013 7:17:20 AM PDT
by
Nachum
(I am Breitbartacus!)
To: SpeakerToAnimals
Actually in Pueblo there were over 30,000 votes, or 1/4 of the population. Pretty good for an election with "voter suppression". Has anyone compared this voter number with the general election number? I'm really curious to know.
33
posted on
09/11/2013 7:18:29 AM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: Nachum
When Democrats lose an election, ‘the election was STOLEN’.
When democrats win an election, ‘the peoples have spoken’.
I am happy that Debbie Blabbermouth-Shultz was so quick to reaffirm this.
34
posted on
09/11/2013 7:18:44 AM PDT
by
Tupelo
(There are no Republicans or Democrats in Washington. Just Millionaires protecting their turf.)
To: Nachum
” . . . that when more people vote, Democrats win.”
She may have a point there - I’ve noticed that in elections in which the total of votes cast is greater than 100% of the number of registered voters, Democrats always win.
35
posted on
09/11/2013 7:21:04 AM PDT
by
Stosh
To: Nachum
She is right thought not in the way she thought. In the first sentence she says “voter suppression, pure and simple”. It was the demoRats that suppressed the will of the people with their vote for gun control and they suppressed the will of the people and got recalled.
36
posted on
09/11/2013 7:21:26 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: mountainlion
37
posted on
09/11/2013 7:25:36 AM PDT
by
txhurl
('The DOG ate my homework. That homework, too. ALL my homework. OK?' - POSHITUS)
To: Nachum
“It was voter suppression, pure and simple”, stated Wasserwomyn-Schultz, “And I hate the stupid meanie faces in the NRA that are responsible!”
38
posted on
09/11/2013 7:27:19 AM PDT
by
BO Stinkss
(Democrats own every single ghetto in America - Just a thought.....)
To: Nachum
voter suppression, pure and simpleProve it, Mophead.
To: Nachum
Debbie Snaggletooth Schultz is a national socialists pig.
40
posted on
09/11/2013 7:31:11 AM PDT
by
SUSSA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson