|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ted Cruz Ping!
Cruz is right!
Cruz is right, as usual.
I heard he was going pheasant shooting with Steve King in Iowa next week. Wish I could go.
He doesn’t have the authority to do a lot of things, but that hasn’t stopped him, he will do what he wants, when he wants, because NO ONE is going to stop him, not dems, not republicans, not “we the people”, dems don’t care, repubs are sitting on their hands looking the other way and “we the people” are not being heard, our representatives and this administration do not care what “we the people” want.
Maybe that's what he wants..
I don’t think a president should be able to order military action without congressional approval unless the nation, our soldiers, or embassies are attacked.
Sadly it appears that those are the only times Obama doesn’t want military action.
Good grief. For decades, we listened to the Democrats make fun of “The Domino Theory”. Now, the Democrats want us to think they believe in a domino theory for the Middle East? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! Put some syrup on that theory Democrats, and eat it!
Since when has hussein even appeared to give a rat’s backside about the Constitution? He is going to do what he wants, lie about it, and blame others for his inevitable failures.
5:46 Minutes
Sen. Ted Cruz Makes the Case Against Attacking Syria on This Week with George Stephanopoulos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnsS0ozbFbI
I love Ted. I was alittle concerned this AM watching this though, as Ted stated emphatically that Assad did the gassing. I thought there was a lot of evidence that the rebels did it and, at the least, none of us know the truth.
I dont think he has the authority, Cruz told ABCs George Stephanopoulos.
It would be contrary to the Constitution,
Article I of the Constitution unequivocally gives Congress, not the president, the power to declare War.
The president can defend against an actual or imminent enemy attack without waiting for Congress. In that case, a state of war would already exist independent of any US action. But the Assad regime has not attacked the US and does not seem likely to do so in the near future.
Obama wrote in 2007 that The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.
You would think that in our country, which has existed more than 200 years, the Constitutional issue of whether or not a President can invade another country without the consent of the people (Congress) would’ve been resolved by now....
6 our of 10 are against a strike. It was 89 to 9. The dumb public is turning. obama thinks he can go on TV and charm the people into backing him. Sadly, he’s probably right.
did Reagan have permission to invade Grenada?
what about Bush and Panama?