Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton

 

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan

 

"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792

 

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams

 

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

 


1 posted on 09/08/2013 8:27:45 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie; ken5050; stephenjohnbanker; LUV W; Patty; itssme; BuckeyeTexan; Jane Long; ...

Ted Cruz Ping!


2 posted on 09/08/2013 8:28:15 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Cruz is right!


3 posted on 09/08/2013 8:29:35 AM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Cruz is right, as usual.

I heard he was going pheasant shooting with Steve King in Iowa next week. Wish I could go.


4 posted on 09/08/2013 8:29:56 AM PDT by Viennacon (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

He doesn’t have the authority to do a lot of things, but that hasn’t stopped him, he will do what he wants, when he wants, because NO ONE is going to stop him, not dems, not republicans, not “we the people”, dems don’t care, repubs are sitting on their hands looking the other way and “we the people” are not being heard, our representatives and this administration do not care what “we the people” want.


5 posted on 09/08/2013 8:30:02 AM PDT by rockabyebaby (We are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo screwed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

6 posted on 09/08/2013 8:30:38 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
If he had ordered the strike, before saying he was going to Congress, and citing the War Powers Act..there would have been a little dust-up over his authority to do so, but it would have blown over in a few days. Now, by asking Congress to approve it, and assuming Congress refuses, to then go ahead would be in effect inviting impeachment.

Maybe that's what he wants..

7 posted on 09/08/2013 8:31:42 AM PDT by ken5050 (According to Dick Lugar, I'm a "random outlier." Woo Hoo!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

I don’t think a president should be able to order military action without congressional approval unless the nation, our soldiers, or embassies are attacked.

Sadly it appears that those are the only times Obama doesn’t want military action.


8 posted on 09/08/2013 8:32:59 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Good grief. For decades, we listened to the Democrats make fun of “The Domino Theory”. Now, the Democrats want us to think they believe in a domino theory for the Middle East? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! Put some syrup on that theory Democrats, and eat it!


9 posted on 09/08/2013 8:37:42 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Since when has hussein even appeared to give a rat’s backside about the Constitution? He is going to do what he wants, lie about it, and blame others for his inevitable failures.


10 posted on 09/08/2013 8:41:47 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie; All

5:46 Minutes
Sen. Ted Cruz Makes the Case Against Attacking Syria on This Week with George Stephanopoulos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnsS0ozbFbI


13 posted on 09/08/2013 8:50:34 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

I love Ted. I was alittle concerned this AM watching this though, as Ted stated emphatically that Assad did the gassing. I thought there was a lot of evidence that the rebels did it and, at the least, none of us know the truth.


18 posted on 09/08/2013 9:12:00 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

“I don’t think he has the authority,” Cruz told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.
“It would be contrary to the Constitution,”

Article I of the Constitution unequivocally gives Congress, not the president, the “power to declare War.”

The president can defend against an actual or imminent enemy attack without waiting for Congress. In that case, a state of war would already exist independent of any US action. But the Assad regime has not attacked the US and does not seem likely to do so in the near future.

Obama wrote in 2007 that “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”


20 posted on 09/08/2013 9:34:09 AM PDT by Marguerite ( When I'm good, I'm very good, but when I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

You would think that in our country, which has existed more than 200 years, the Constitutional issue of whether or not a President can invade another country without the consent of the people (Congress) would’ve been resolved by now....


40 posted on 09/08/2013 2:22:40 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

6 our of 10 are against a strike. It was 89 to 9. The dumb public is turning. obama thinks he can go on TV and charm the people into backing him. Sadly, he’s probably right.


41 posted on 09/08/2013 2:47:40 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

did Reagan have permission to invade Grenada?
what about Bush and Panama?


45 posted on 09/08/2013 6:31:50 PM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson