Skip to comments.Boy, 1, shot to death in stroller on NYC street
Posted on 09/02/2013 8:54:22 AM PDT by chessplayer
NEW YORK (AP) A 1-year-old boy in a stroller was fatally shot in the face as his parents pushed him across a city street, and police continued looking for the gunman Monday.
Antiq Hennis and his parents were walking across a street in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn at about 7:20 p.m. Sunday when shots were fired and the boy was hit, police said. Investigators have yet to determine who was the intended target, and no arrests have been made, police said Monday.
Brownsville section ... ?
Maybe if Obama outlaws some more WWI and WWII rifles the violence will stop.
“Boy, 1, shot to death in stroller on NYC street”
#NYC is Liberal
#NYC is gun-free
The”Line”has been crossed!!!This is DESPICABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!
One of the Amish neighborhoods.
Maybe Obama will send the USN in and attack
Or a really late term abortion. /s
It wasn’t in “NYC”. It was in Brownsville, Brooklyn, which might as well be in the Ivory Coast.
“Actually, it might not be a bad idea to send troops in to knock some heads in these gang-controlled neighborhoods.”
That would violate the U. S. Constitution. This pseudo-administration has done enough of that. I do not want to see it trampled upon any more than it has already been trampled.
I do not want to see any precedents set. If they do it once and get away with it then you could be next on the list.
You should be saying, “Keep the troop involvement out of the U. S. A.”.
They were going for the father. Stroller had four holes in it. Bad aim.
Brooklyn is part of NYC. It’s one of the 5 boroughs.
I think you need to read montag813’s post more carefully.
The people that live in these areas have a set of morals and values so different from ours that they should be considered foreign. They hold our values and morals in contempt. Toward us they are hostile, dangerous, and deadly violent. Any white person who valued their life would quickly learn that there are certain areas they just should not go. This is literally foreign held enemy territory.
But like we learned in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan you can easily occupy territory with troops but you can't easily change a culture of a people and nigh impossible to change their inherent nature.
Apparently a new sport in some communities. They just convicted a community member down in Georgia for doing that.
In his latest Ramirez covers:
Syria Denies Using Chemical Weapons
But NY has strict ‘gun control’ laws!!
Obviously the laws made it harder for law-abiding non-violent people to defend themselves, and easier for violent criminals to commit crime with guns.
Well then the shooter is in REAL BIG trouble now.
Probably the "gun turned sideways" stance.
getting to be a nasty habit SOP with Os sons.
Are Al and Jesse on the scene? Guess not . . . looks like the scumbag that shot this little guy is a minority. Won’t see hide nor hare of Jackson and Sharpton. Neither will you here any outrage or comments by Obama or Holder.
Got an Article/Section reference for that?
You’re right. If they can’t blame Whity they can’t advance their agenda of hate.
True, but legalizing all drugs would bankrupt the gangs.
I agree the 'War on Drugs ' is a liberty eroding failure but ending it won't solve the underlying problems. Very few of these inner city gangs are anywhere close to what you call organized or are dependent on income to remain viable like there were the ghetto version of the Corleones. They are just a loose association of young men that grew up together and commit crimes together. If drugs are made legal these cretins wont' suddenly become upstanding citizens. They find other illicit ways to make money and may become even more dangerous. Plus you'll still have to contend with all the degenerate drug abusers who'll be degenerates on or off drugs.
“Plus you’ll still have to contend with all the degenerate drug abusers who’ll be degenerates on or off drugs.”
With unrestricted drug availability, within a year or two druggies would mostly be dead from overdoses.
This trend is frightening.
Genuine question: what exactly is a borough? I don’t think we have those down South.
Well, except for ground hog holes.
Earlier today, my sons and I saw what appeared to be military chopper circling our neighborhood. My younger son, aged 18, seriously asked if Obama might be getting ready to drop bombs on us.
I told him that so far, O's only been using drones to kill Americans.
But Americans are genuinely wondering about this man. The racial mobs are seen to be a prelude to military action.
That can’t be, there are strict gun control laws in that city!
I wouldn’t want to risk some nice military guys or gals lives going up against the feral population...
This explains it better than I can.
More info here.
“Got an Article/Section reference for that?”
Read the U. S. Constitution. It’s in there. I am not going to do your research for you.
I’ve read it.
I say it ain’t there.
You say it is there; cite a reference.
What is there, in Article I Section 8, as a funtion of Congress, is “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; “
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.