Skip to comments.
Obama Refers to U.S. Armed Forces as ‘My Military’; Twitter Users Go Just a Tad Ballistic
The Blaze ^
| Aug. 31, 2013
| Dave Urbanski
Posted on 08/31/2013 11:39:33 PM PDT by LucianOfSamasota
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Obama I
To: LucianOfSamasota
Well, he is The Emperor, or the King, or is he god? Oh, yeah, the One.
WADAPUTZ.
2
posted on
08/31/2013 11:48:43 PM PDT
by
Blue Collar Christian
(Vote Democrat. Once you're OK with killing babies the rest is easy. <BCC><)
To: LucianOfSamasota
Does he ever say “My Michelle”? How about “my country”?
Or “My fellow Americans”?
To: LucianOfSamasota
Hes a boot-licking butt licker. He refers to it as MY Military in the descriptive sense of it being made in my image, going from all voluntary to all LGBT, a military force once, the admiration of the world has now been degraded to the equivalent of Chelseas three ring freak show. If youre male when enlisted, you dont have to be when youre discharged. (Now, thats a pun Im not going near)
4
posted on
08/31/2013 11:53:44 PM PDT
by
lbryce
(The 22nd Amendment Lives:1142 Days Until America's Greatest Nemesis Gets the Heave "Ho")
To: LucianOfSamasota
Hell, if you took all the first person personal and reflexive pronouns oout of the language, this SOB would be speechless!!
5
posted on
09/01/2013 12:01:39 AM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”- Voltaire)
To: LucianOfSamasota
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States........something to keep in mind as we debate the war powers.
6
posted on
09/01/2013 12:07:26 AM PDT
by
RC one
To: LucianOfSamasota
Too many possessive pronouns are the hallmark of narcicism and needing credit for anything he can attach himself to while divorcing himself for that which he is rightly responsible for.
He created Syria.
Why?
7
posted on
09/01/2013 12:07:56 AM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: LucianOfSamasota
I think he meant to say ‘my military advisors’ reading the context of what he was saying?
8
posted on
09/01/2013 12:10:25 AM PDT
by
rawhide
To: LucianOfSamasota; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; ...
To: RC one
What to do when this part: "
...I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic... has to deal with the enemy being
...the President of the United States....
What has that man done to the benefit of the US?
How much has he done which has harmed it?
How much has he done to provide aid (military support) and comfort to our enemies?
And here we go again.
America didn't want his "healthcare" program.
BOHICA
America would not have approved of running guns to Mexican Drug Cartels.
BOHICA
America scratched its head at military intervention in "protests" in Libya and Egypt...
BOHICA
America doesn't want to become involved in Syria, especially on the side of the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaida...(like Egypt and Libya)....
?
10
posted on
09/01/2013 12:33:46 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: LucianOfSamasota
The teleprompter reader just can’t hack it without his script.
This guy just isn’t qualified for the job in any way shape or form. He’s become a global laughingstock.... The only thing more embarrassing to America are the fools who voted for him.
11
posted on
09/01/2013 12:39:39 AM PDT
by
Bullish
(Psalm 46)
To: Smokin' Joe
America voted for the son of a bitch. BOHICA.
12
posted on
09/01/2013 12:43:55 AM PDT
by
RC one
To: LucianOfSamasota
Shortly before he began his first power Valerie Jarrett, in an interview still available on YouTube, said that Obama was “prepared to really take power and begin to rule on day one.” He has had dictatorial tendencies since before he was sworn in.
13
posted on
09/01/2013 12:55:14 AM PDT
by
Piranha
(Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have - Saul Alinsky)
To: Piranha
His first term, not his first power. Sorry for the typo.
14
posted on
09/01/2013 12:56:40 AM PDT
by
Piranha
(Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have - Saul Alinsky)
To: LucianOfSamasota
My little tin soldiers...
My blue army and my red army...
Oh what fun I have on the rug in the Oval office when its raining and I cant go out and play...golf...
To: RC one
I'm not so sure America voted for him, but the ballot count we were handed told us so, even though there were precincts with over 100% of registered voters voting and which voted 100% for Obama.
If you want to believe that was anything but fraud, I have some swampland for sale...and a bridge.
I don't believe he was legitimately elected. Furthermore, I don't believe he is even Constitutionally eligible to hold the office.
16
posted on
09/01/2013 1:08:24 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: LucianOfSamasota; All
17
posted on
09/01/2013 1:24:04 AM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(IRS = Internal Revenge Service)
To: RC one; Smokin' Joe
The oath you quoted is a National Guard oath.
The oath for regular service officers in the Army, Navy Air Force and Marines contains no such provision. Here it is, verbatim:
"I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."
This oath is specifically constructed to put the onus of conscience on the individual officer. Why the NG oath differs, I am not certain, but the regular service officers are bound only by the oath as quoted above.
18
posted on
09/01/2013 1:33:37 AM PDT
by
shibumi
(Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
To: Vendome
He also, probably, had a hand in creating the Iraq insurgency.
When a certain group of people, who some of you would probably recognize, set up the insurgency, all things point to them being very conversant with Obama. That was in 2003. From 2007 out, that same group was helping Obama with planning and political action.
And yes, the AQ Iraq insurgency was set up by Saudi Arabia and helpers of many different kinds in the US. The group knew *everything* about insurgency financing, routes into the country, recruiting and so on several days before we saw the first resistance.
19
posted on
09/01/2013 1:37:51 AM PDT
by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of the Muslim Brotherhood))
To: shibumi
Thanks for clearing that up!
I'm not sure why the National Guard oath is that way, either. Especially since most states consider their detachments to be the official State Militia.
20
posted on
09/01/2013 1:38:27 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson