It is a question. Not a relevant one if the targets of U.S. intervention are known. In my opinion, there are no “good guys” at this point. There are women and children being killed with CW, and I cannot stomach that. If Obama is resolute in this, and attacks who he thinks is responsible, I will support him. Damn lot better than he deserves though given his criticisms of W and the surge. But our soldiers carrying out the mission and the U.S. standing in the world is far more important than him. Be
sides, how badass will it be to say “In America, our peace prize winners will blow you away!!!”
Of course, it's relevant. We've no business intervening on the side of the rebels if they are the ones who used the CW.
There are women and children being killed with CW, and I cannot stomach that.
Can you stomach women and children being killed with rifles and machetes?
The jihadi rebels seem particularly prone to massacres -- especially the Aliwite and Christian minorities.
“how badass will it be to say “In America, our peace prize winners will blow you away!!!””
One side is busily murdering Christians and is flying the flag of Al Qeida, the same people who blew up the world trade center on 9/11.
On the other side is an authoritarian Israel hating moslem dictator aligned with Hezbollah and the Iranians.
Which side should the US Navy help out so you can feel macho? Which side will be the new friend of America?
Can you stomach the genocide of Christians, ALL Christians, by the ‘rebels’? The mb murdered thousands of their own people to attract sympathy from the world press. Women and children, young and old, and the live Egypt thread shows the proof. This is rebel activity. Is this what we support? What YOU support?