Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: campaignPete R-CT

I like Cruz— He will be a great Attorney General but you CAN NOT be born out side of the US as a citizen of that country. His presidential aspirations are over.


16 posted on 08/24/2013 9:17:28 PM PDT by SADMILLIE (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark

I guess we got to around 20 on this thread. Sad, sad Millie.


24 posted on 08/24/2013 9:55:22 PM PDT by txhurl ('The DOG ate my homework. That homework, too. ALL my homework. OK?' - POSHITUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SADMILLIE

You will be proven wrong. Of that there is no doubt.


35 posted on 08/25/2013 5:56:28 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SADMILLIE

Fortunately the rest of us are not handicapped by your mistaken understanding of the law.

It’s about time the birthers start getting zotted.


38 posted on 08/25/2013 6:19:21 AM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SADMILLIE
I like Cruz— He will be a great Attorney General but you CAN NOT be born out side of the US as a citizen of that country. His presidential aspirations are over.

Please point out the relevant part of the US Constitution that supports your opinion of the meaning of "Natural Born" citizenship requirements.

Lacking that, please point out the relevant law pass by the US Congress and signed by a US President that supports your opinion of the meaning of "Natural Born" citizenship requirements.

Lacking that, please point out the relevant US Supreme Court ruling that supports your opinion of the meaning of "Natural Born" citizenship requirements.

If you can't provide any of the above, you don't have a leg to stand on.

You see, the founders of this country (those guys who wrote the US Constitution) were really smart guys and with the exception of Slavery (for very real and well-stated reasons) covered everything that they could think of at the time in detail. I sincerely doubt that if they thought as you do on this subject, they would have overlooked this issue and not have left clear requirements/definition in the Constitution.

Does not seem very likely.
43 posted on 08/25/2013 8:09:32 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson