Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Coburn calls for a national Constitutional Convention
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | AUGUST 22, 2013 AT 1:20 PM | By CHARLIE SPIERING

Posted on 08/22/2013 1:05:12 PM PDT by Red Badger

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., explained to a town hall of his constituents that he wanted to call a national Constitutional Convention after reading Mark Levin’s new book, The Liberty Amendments.

“I used to have a great fear of constitutional conventions,” Coburn said according to the Tulsa World. “I have a great fear now of not having one.”

As the Tulsa World notes, a national convention is called by two-thirds of the state legislatures and is one of two ways the U.S. Constitution can be amended.

Coburn made his remarks in Muskogee, Okla.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: concon; constitution; convention; oklahoma; tomcoburn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-248 next last
To: Repeal The 17th
"Whatever the convention came up with would have to be approved by 3/4ths of the 50 states, so what is your concern?"

If all a Con-Con produces is liberal, socialist legislation that's doomed to be rejected by more than 1/4 of the states, why even waste the time and money?

There is no Constitutional "solution" to the mess we've gotten ourselves into (other than the 2nd Amendment), because TPTB don't respect the Constitution. The only way we're going to wrestle our Republic out of the jaws of those who want to see it dead and gone, is for the states to form a coalition to tell Congress, the Obammunist, and the courts how it's going to be. The states need to tell DC which laws, which governing bodies, and which court decisions they'll (we'll) abide by, and reassert that "federal" means power shared between the states and the national government.

The states created Congress, and it's about damn time they step and remind those Potomac swamp rats of it. The states created the Constitution, which strictly limits and defines the powers of the national government, and reserves all other powers for the states and the people. They/we need to tell those elected thugs how it's going to be, not go begging to them, hat in hand.

Unfortunately, I don't there are enough guts in the various state capitals to even comprehend what needs to be done.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

61 posted on 08/22/2013 2:02:21 PM PDT by wku man (It's almost deer season, got your DEERGOGGLES on yet? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jexrnFq2fXY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

We should just pass the Old Constitution.

And say that this time we mean it.....


62 posted on 08/22/2013 2:04:07 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Here's how it will play out. Let's say that 34 states request a general convention so that Levin's proposals can be addressed. For the moment, let's ignore the tricks that Congress can play to avoid calling an Amendments Convention. They used those tricks in 1912 to avoid a convention over the issue of direct election of senators, so there is precedent for congressional intransigence. But let's put that aside and say that Congress sets the time and place for the states to assemble in convention.

That ABA Report will be retrieved from 535 dusty file cabinets in a warehouse somewhere, and 50 different bills will be introduced to regulate the selection of delegates and the conduct of the convention. Eventually, the House and Senate will agree on a bill despite Rand Paul's arguing that Congress has no place in the proceedings. By the way, I agree with Paul and you, but I'm just telling you how power politics work.

At least one state attorney general will go to federal court to argue that Congress has overstepped his bounds. He'll be making your arguments. Eventually, it will reach the Supreme Court, and we'll get one of those definitive decisions like Dillon or Coleman. I don't know which way the Court will go, considering that there are already two precedents allowing Congress wide latitude in regulating the amendatory process.

Eventually, your side will win, or Congress will win. I'm not prepared to wager on the outcome.

63 posted on 08/22/2013 2:05:52 PM PDT by Publius (And so, night falls on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

I have not read it yet. What is his answer for “it will get hijacked by Liberal activists”? Cause that’s my biggest fear. They’d enthusiastically jump on-board and then use it to implement FDR’s Second Bill of Rights.


64 posted on 08/22/2013 2:10:26 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O

“I look at Congress and I look at the legislatures and I don’t see any Madisons or Washingtons or Franklins or Hamiltons or Shermans or any of the quality of leaders that gave us this magnificent document to begin with.”

That’s true. It was an amazing group of men, of the first, second and even third tiers.

But there have been scheming rogues in every time, mainly because they are the types that go into politics for the most part, and as John Adams wrote, the “ones with teh deepest pockets or the least scruples” get elected. It has always been so. We have to work with what we have. I’m sure there are men like Cruz and Lee in the legislatures out there.


65 posted on 08/22/2013 2:14:42 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Last night a caller on Levin’s show said that Coburn had mentioned Levin’s book at a town hall and expressed his support for the idea of a CC. Apparently the caller wasn’t kidding. Pretty big that a senator has latched onto Levin’s idea, I think.


66 posted on 08/22/2013 2:20:53 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
We need more Constitutional amendments for the politicians and judges to ignore?

Some amendments cannot be ignored, such as term limits or returning selection of Senators back to state legislatures.

It would be quite the sight to watch a Senator refuse to vacate his office.

-PJ

67 posted on 08/22/2013 2:29:11 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I don’t know how delegates would be selected but if it’s by our present electorial process now in place or if it’s by political appointments we have much to lose. I would prefer to go by the original intent of our Constitution, even those who have subverted it know what that is. All we have to do is get past those in power today, democrats, elite and rino republicans and progressives.


68 posted on 08/22/2013 2:30:27 PM PDT by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers
How about we save the massive CF that a CC would likely become, and find some LEADERS with the integrity and balls to ENFORCE the one we already have ? !
69 posted on 08/22/2013 2:33:32 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I did not make myself.

There already exist a way to change the constitution. Amendments can be proposed and the states can vote on them.

Without the need to toss the entire constitution.


70 posted on 08/22/2013 2:34:24 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

BTTT BOOKMARK!

Dear Lord, please share Your strength and wisdom.


71 posted on 08/22/2013 2:38:14 PM PDT by thesearethetimes... ("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." Dorothy Bernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is an attempt to divide conservatives!!!!!!!!!!!

Absolutely NOT on 0bam-says watch.

Agree with many here saying this is INSANE.

The current Constitution should be enforced! It’s in-your-face NOT being enforced.


72 posted on 08/22/2013 2:38:14 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

I don’t have the book yet, but I’ve been listening and watching Mark a lot in the promotion of the book. He’s saying the states can call the convention and the state legislatures would select the delegates. What he thinks that does is create a firewall to keep out the leftist amendments because there’s no way 2/3 of the states would send delegates to produce leftwing amendments. Nor would 3/4 of the states ratify them afterwards.


73 posted on 08/22/2013 2:42:51 PM PDT by ilgipper (Obama is proving that very bad ideas can be wrapped up in pretty words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There are no rules that I know of governing a Constitutional Convention, as to who gets to be ‘in charge’, who is allowed to attend, who is responsible for the costs and where it is to be held and what is to be discussed.................

Oh boo hoo, maybe get involved if one happens in your state.


74 posted on 08/22/2013 2:46:07 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O
The thought of opening up the Constitution to the Pelosis and Reids and McConnells and Boehners of the world to “fix” it scares the hell out of me.

At least it won't be Pelosi, Reid, McConnell, or Boehner. They are constitutionally prohibited as long as they hold their current offices.

-PJ

75 posted on 08/22/2013 2:46:50 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

“All delegates to the Con Con will not be conservaatives. This is a bad idea to the 10th power.”

The delegates would be representatives of their states, which is appropriate. The convention would still vote on what amendments they would send to the states, and three-fourths of the state legislatures would still need to ratify them.

If we cannot trust our own people to vote the right way then this is the last gasp before an actual revolution...

If we do not breathe we will certainly succumb to tyranny by drowning in it...


76 posted on 08/22/2013 2:49:31 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
> Nor would 3/4 of the states ratify them afterwards.

Don't be too sure about that.
The beauty of this plan is that it leverages the innate desire of a pol to give himself more power to rectify the overreach of the feds.

77 posted on 08/22/2013 2:49:46 PM PDT by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
They are constitutionally prohibited as long as they hold their current offices.

Referring to the documents to which I linked in Post #15, the ALEC Document agrees with your assertion. The ABA Report does not. It's not that cut and dried.

I recommend you print off and read both documents. Even if you find the ABA Report tilted way too much toward congressional control of an Amendments Convention, the committee that wrote that report did a thorough and conscientious job of identifying all the gray areas in the amendatory process.

78 posted on 08/22/2013 2:51:00 PM PDT by Publius (And so, night falls on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

[ A constitutional convention is the most dangerous idea I have heard lately.

Amendments can be proposed and voted on by the states if changes are required.

Once a constitutional convention is opened, everything can change. Do we really want to do that when the left control so much of the power right now?

This idea is insane. ]

If we cannot trust our own people to vote the right way then this is the last gasp before an actual revolution...

If we do not breathe we will certainly succumb to tyranny by drowning in it...


79 posted on 08/22/2013 2:51:13 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: x

[ It’s not going to happen. And does he really expect that Democrats and liberals won’t run and be elected to the convention? That somehow everybody there would be conservative?

Maybe Coburn’s thinking a convention would vote on its decisions by state. That won’t happen. Too many delegates would want the votes to be apportioned by population.

I could see a constitutional convention (if one ever happened) breaking up over just that issue. ]

If we cannot trust our own people to vote the right way then this is the last gasp before an actual revolution...

If we do not breathe we will certainly succumb to tyranny by drowning in it...


80 posted on 08/22/2013 2:51:30 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson