That pretty much sums it up in a nutshell. And that is why I find your observation that Mark Levin is naïve to be hard to understand. Of all the talk jocks, Levin is loudest and clearest that the Republican establishment has to go-hardly a naïve position unless you mean that he is unlikely to get his reforms through by way of Article V, but I note that you do see a chance to prevail?
Anyway if he is to prevail it will be against Rove and the WSJ editors and, probably, Roger Ailes.
I should have clarified I didn’t mean he’s naive about the GOPe
I think he is naive about the demographic tidal waves looming not just here but the west in general
I don’t cotton to his notions...like some here as well...that accentuating the purging of the South as the great demon makes up for all our other politically incorrect warts....Indians....women’s rights....Mexicans.... the earth.... etc
And at the same time rightfully lauding Mason etc as he does
Does he think Mason would not have seceded too in similar circumstance or Madison or Jefferson etc
Or would not have resisted northern political hegemony
Of course he would have
Maybe naive was a wrong word.....
I’m ambivalent on Levin on
these aspects but he is trying
And I’m grateful