Skip to comments.
Obama administration asks Supreme Court to allow warrantless cellphone searches
The Washington Post ^
| August 19, 2013
| Timothy B. Lee
Posted on 08/19/2013 3:41:11 PM PDT by rarestia
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
If they're asking permission, they're already doing it.
1
posted on
08/19/2013 3:41:11 PM PDT
by
rarestia
To: rarestia
“YES WE SCAN!”
sorry I stole it.
2
posted on
08/19/2013 3:43:06 PM PDT
by
hadaclueonce
(dont worry about Mexico, put the fence around kalifornia.)
To: rarestia
3
posted on
08/19/2013 3:44:20 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: rarestia
... at least that’ll make it constitutional, right? (/sarc)
4
posted on
08/19/2013 3:44:51 PM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: rarestia
a cellphone is different because it involves other persons.
To: rarestia
a cellphone is different because it involves other persons.
To: rarestia
a cellphone is different because it involves other persons.
To: rarestia
I’m all for efficiency in law enforcement - in fact I have an idea to further speed up the arrest/trial/sentencing process. Why don’t you take suspected criminals directly to the Penitentiary when you arrest them, and schedule the trial at your convenience?
8
posted on
08/19/2013 3:52:22 PM PDT
by
ZOOKER
(Until further notice the /s is implied...)
To: rarestia
I’m all for efficiency in law enforcement - in fact I have an idea to further speed up the arrest/trial/sentencing process. Why don’t you take suspected criminals directly to the Penitentiary when you arrest them, and schedule the trial at your convenience?
9
posted on
08/19/2013 3:52:27 PM PDT
by
ZOOKER
(Until further notice the /s is implied...)
To: rarestia
I’m all for efficiency in law enforcement - in fact I have an idea to further speed up the arrest/trial/sentencing process. Why don’t you take suspected criminals directly to the Penitentiary when you arrest them, and schedule the trial at your convenience?
10
posted on
08/19/2013 3:52:32 PM PDT
by
ZOOKER
(Until further notice the /s is implied...)
To: rarestia
To: ZOOKER
Sorry for the dupe posts, FR really glitch tonight...
12
posted on
08/19/2013 3:55:36 PM PDT
by
ZOOKER
(Until further notice the /s is implied...)
To: Diogenesis
13
posted on
08/19/2013 3:56:07 PM PDT
by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
To: TurboZamboni
Um ... I’m pretty sure that the guy in your picture is General of the Armies John “Blackjack” Pershing.
To: Sopater
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
15
posted on
08/19/2013 4:03:37 PM PDT
by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: ZOOKER; Travis McGee
Why dont you take suspected criminals directly to the Penitentiary when you arrest them, and schedule the trial at your convenience?I believe that's already provided for.
In the NDAA that Odinga signed.
Intended for use on opponents to the regime, conservatives, and other untermenschen.
16
posted on
08/19/2013 4:04:38 PM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(Opinions are like orgasms: only mine count, and I couldn't care less if you have one...)
To: rarestia
This presents a good opportunity for an entrepreneur, to pre-load phones with “safe” data, like cat pictures, or even data that could at least muddle the criminal complaint so much that it would ease acquittal.
17
posted on
08/19/2013 4:07:33 PM PDT
by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(Be Brave! Fear is just the opposite of Nar!)
To: ZOOKER
Hanging arrested persons on the spot is a sure deterrent to crime.
18
posted on
08/19/2013 4:09:22 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Where's my pressure cooker backpack wmd ricin laced al qaeda terrorist BASSELOPE?)
To: rarestia
Start with Bozo and his entire administration. F-ing fascists MFer’s
19
posted on
08/19/2013 4:15:26 PM PDT
by
eyedigress
((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?s)
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Isn’t anyone very disturbed that there is any doubt that this is illegal on the very face of it?
20
posted on
08/19/2013 4:16:21 PM PDT
by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson