Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Isn’t anyone very disturbed that there is any doubt that this is illegal on the very face of it?


20 posted on 08/19/2013 4:16:21 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: The Antiyuppie

I am. I wonder if, in the cases involving address books etc., search means looking for contraband or searching for the information contained therein or both.


24 posted on 08/19/2013 4:40:19 PM PDT by pluvmantelo (A Greenie is one distraught knowing that somewhere, someone is living above subsistence level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: The Antiyuppie

Not really, since the SCOTUS has long held that any conversation that uses a cellphone has no expectation of privacy. They have really beaten the issue to death, that any and every form of electronic communication can be monitored by the government at whim.

In most cases, even face to face communication has little protection. If the government installs listening devices, it is a crime to tamper with them, interfere with them, or even point them out to others.


25 posted on 08/19/2013 4:48:34 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Be Brave! Fear is just the opposite of Nar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: The Antiyuppie
Isn’t anyone very disturbed that there is any doubt that this is illegal on the very face of it?

I am. I am also skeptical that the SC will decide the Consitution means what it says.
40 posted on 08/19/2013 7:26:54 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson