Posted on 08/19/2013 6:42:52 AM PDT by shortstop
The told me that reproduction could not be obtained through sodomy.
With so man A**holes running around I think I have been misinformed.
Whatever.
Franco II
That’s the main problem with Obama’s evil regime, otherwise known as the central socialist government.
There’s such an overabundance of a-sholes that the homosexuals are like bees after honey.
So true, my man, so sadly true.
Agree 100%.
Tempest in a Teapot. Too little too late.
Leave the Stupid Party.
Register Independent now!
Best dabates ever?
Lincoln-Douglas.
No moderator.
We haven’t had a real presidential debate in 50 years.
I totally agree.. Just because the Idiots (Speaking RINO here) were smart enough to not support the LSM, has NOTHING to do with ‘FREE SPEECH’.. Just like any of us can boycott any business..
Never heard of this guy ‘Bob’ until this article, but what he is saying tells me all I need to know.. he is ‘one of them, and not one of us’.
Debates? WHAT debates?! :/
Between (Hopefully Conserv) Repub and a Dem: Softball to Dem, Controversial to Repub..
Between Repub Candidates: Anything that will start infighting (moral/social/financial issues).. known disagreements or differences of opinion/moral values.
There are only two sides to this issue. You (the general ‘you’) either want RINOS in power or you do not.
When people support RINOS they do exactly that. They cannot support RINOS today and then excuse them this afternoon. That goes for talk show hosts, Heros of the right, average joes or Freepers...who damn well ought to be screaming the loudest AGAINST all manner of RINOism.
But we don’t see that. All of the above regularly come up with excuses about how we have to compromise our way into irrelevance and REALLY scream about anyone saying No friggin way.
Two sides. Side of the RINOS or Side of the Conservatives. People need to pick one and go with it.
There are only two sides to this issue. You (the general ‘you’) either want RINOS in power or you do not.
When people support RINOS they do exactly that. They cannot support RINOS today and then excuse them this afternoon. That goes for talk show hosts, Heros of the right, average joes or Freepers...who damn well ought to be screaming the loudest AGAINST all manner of RINOism.
But we don’t see that. All of the above regularly come up with excuses about how we have to compromise our way into irrelevance and REALLY scream about anyone saying No friggin way.
Two sides. Side of the RINOS or Side of the Conservatives. People need to pick one and go with it.
So far, I don't come under 0bamacare because I'm a Vet...
Oh, the First lady is not going to comply.
You, IRS, you just read that right? In the fwiw department (which FReepers can attest), she is well armed and well practiced.
5.56mm
So far, I don't come under 0bamacare because I'm a Vet...
Oh, the First lady is not going to comply.
You, IRS, you just read that right? In the fwiw department (which FReepers can attest), she is well armed and well practiced.
5.56mm
I do see where your friend (C. Edmund Wright) on the other thread, got the idea that you see things in absolute binary. On/off. Yes/No.
Quantum physics shows us that there is On/Off and Maybe. And there are infinite levels of Maybe.
I agree we cannot give Concessions1 in the Liberal's favor, during negotiations with Democrats, nor can we engage in Unequal Compromises2 in the Liberal's favor. However, I suggest that we *must* engage in one of three things: Compromises3, Concessions1 in the Conservative's favor, or Unequal Compromises2 in the Conservative's favor.
When our opponents see things and more importantly, operate in binary, compromise in any form means toy compromise while they do not.
Between rational people working toward a common end, sure. Compromise is currency. Between people who one is all or nothing, you either match them or lose ground. And next negotiation you lose a little more et all. That is incrementalism and that is why RINOs and liberals win against conservatives regularly. We compromise and meet their demands. They never do.
Perhaps someone is assuming that people who are not interested in the GOP primaries will watch them on CNN or NBC because there is nothing else to watch on tv...
I however assume that those who tune in to watch the debates will do so because they have an interest...And since all who have an interest in the GOP debates also have access to Fox, they will tune in to Fox to watch the primary debates...
I don’t buy this guy’s rant...
>So far, I don’t come under 0bamacare because I’m a Vet...<
.
Splain please — I am a vet too. Pre-Vietnam, does that count?
Or are you a doctor of dogs, cows and cats?
I am a vet too. Pre-Vietnam, does that count?
Yes. I am a Vietnam era veteran.
Unfortunately, I read the entire bill. Only thing that applies to us is "shall report," by the VA and HHS. Nothing else (so far) pertains to us.
5.56mm
“Several (a lot, actually) on FR advocate that talkshow hosts, like Rush, Hannity, Levin should moderate the debates.
I have great doubt that they would be that wonderful as debate moderators. I have heard too many of them, too many times, literally melt in fascination and awe when prominent politician figures show up on their programs to be interviewed. Those hosts turn into junior high school giddy little girls, guffawing at the being the presence of greatness.”
Somebody finally NAILED this. They choke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.