Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This judge is an idiot. There is no "constitutional right" for U.S. citizens to be covered by Sharia law.
1 posted on 08/16/2013 11:33:05 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: grundle

Where does this court clown get the authority to do this? She sounds like she might be a real ditz.


2 posted on 08/16/2013 11:39:58 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Former Rodeo Clown Sensitivity Training class valedictorian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

The case will proceed to the Supreme Court, where the four liberal guys will be hard-pressed to agree on this ruling. You can’t make up pieces of the Constitution and insist to the public that you have fake rights.


3 posted on 08/16/2013 11:40:06 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

A native of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Miles-LaGrange, received a certificate from the University of Ghana in Accra, Ghana, West Africa in 1973, and graduated cum laude from Vassar College in 1974. She then received her J.D. from Howard University School of Law in Washington, DC in 1977. There, she was an editor of The Howard Law Journal.

Nominated by Clinton. No surprises that she ruled this way. She’s an affirmative action appointee.


4 posted on 08/16/2013 11:40:47 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

The part of the law that really is stupid is the part prohibiting courts from considering international law. If a foreign company invests in a US plant, what law applies? This is just the kind of well intentioned but poorly thought out idiocy that makes us look stupid. And it would have meant much less investment in Oklahoma.


5 posted on 08/16/2013 11:51:28 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

8 posted on 08/17/2013 12:03:02 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itsahoot

Ping to self


9 posted on 08/17/2013 12:05:17 AM PDT by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

so individual law trumps society’s law?


10 posted on 08/17/2013 12:06:35 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

On Thursday the U.S. district judge made the ban permanent when she issued an order forbidding the State Election Board from certifying the election.

The state needs to stand up to this usurpation.


11 posted on 08/17/2013 12:11:29 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

It is very instructive to track how many god-awful decisions are handed down by female judges.

VERY few women possess the requisite judicial temperament.

Wait, did I type something politically incorrect?


12 posted on 08/17/2013 12:12:14 AM PDT by man_in_tx (Blowback (Faithfully farting twowards Mecca five times daily).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
Well. I'm just shocked!
13 posted on 08/17/2013 12:15:11 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Take off the robe; put on a burka, “judge”.


15 posted on 08/17/2013 12:23:24 AM PDT by windsorknot (>>>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Why is she still alive?


16 posted on 08/17/2013 12:25:02 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
The judge says that “upholding an individual’s constitutional rights” is more important than the will of the masses

my constitutional right to free association and religious freedoms doesn't seem to amount to a hill of beans when i'm forced to provide my businesses services to a buinch of sodomites

18 posted on 08/17/2013 12:35:05 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
According to Sharia Law, women are considered subservient, second-class citizens. So how does this moron with a JD reconcile treating a woman in such a way that clearly violates the woman's constitutional right to be equal an citizen?

liberalism is a disease.

19 posted on 08/17/2013 12:35:30 AM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

“U.S. District Judge Vickie Miles-Legrange issued a temporary injunction after a Muslim resident sued”

There is now. This is legal precedent that Sharia Law takes priority over American jurisprudence.


21 posted on 08/17/2013 12:54:32 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

*sigh* another hyphenated name..


24 posted on 08/17/2013 1:00:45 AM PDT by cardinal4 (The GOP, the ultimate battered wife? Or willing co-conspirators? You decide..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Vickie Miles-Deranged should be impeached for incompetance.


27 posted on 08/17/2013 1:31:39 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Ok, so what would the judge do if Oklahoma would pass a law requiring courts to use Biblical law in deciding cases?


29 posted on 08/17/2013 2:14:08 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Is that the same Sharia law that marries children to old men, and mutilates female sex organs? Sounds completely Constitutional to me!

Most dangerous place to be after a terrorist attack is to be between a politician and a mosque.


30 posted on 08/17/2013 2:31:26 AM PDT by Dogbert41 (Thy Kingdom come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
The judge says that “upholding an individual’s constitutional rights” is more important than the will of the masses. I would agree if indeed the will of the masses violated the constitutional rights of an individual. However, I’m not sure how it’s an “individual’s constitutional right” to have a US court consider sharia or international law when adjudicating a case.

Exactly. It's not. The only cases that should matter in a U.S. court decision are previous U.S. court decisions, not foreign or sharia. I wonder if her ruling would have been the same if, instead of sharia, it was some court set up by a group of Christians.

31 posted on 08/17/2013 3:09:45 AM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson