Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bloomberg’s Public Housing Fingerprinting Idea Stuns, Infuriates Residents
CBS ^ | 16 Aug 13 | Staff

Posted on 08/16/2013 6:58:14 PM PDT by SkyPilot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-107 next last
I think one of the posters to the news story said it best:

"Something tells me that most of them are fingerprinted already."

1 posted on 08/16/2013 6:58:14 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Oh heck...just go ahead and put a micro-chip in every New Yorker.

It’s “for the children”


2 posted on 08/16/2013 6:59:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The top rated comment from the CBS site:

___________________________________________________________________

Put me in charge of food stamps. Food Stamp ATM cards could only be used for food without the ability to get cash. No money for junk food, alcohol, tobacco, or sodas - just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, alcohol or tobacco, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV, Xbox 360 or a cell phone, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It might be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing or whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims, low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and use that $$ to reduce the debt.

Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money youhave to accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin "self-esteem," consider that it wasn't all that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make those bad choices.

AND while you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct, since voting would be a conflict of interest. You will abstain from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then GET A JOB.

3 posted on 08/16/2013 7:00:25 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Bloomberg could just tattoo their identification number on their left forearm.
4 posted on 08/16/2013 7:04:42 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Bloomberg is a blooming fascist. Please tell him to get out of Colorado


5 posted on 08/16/2013 7:07:50 PM PDT by cookcounty (IRS = Internal Revenge Service.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

AND have random, monthly drug tests for every recipient of government money. Those who test positive would have their government money revoked for eight months.


6 posted on 08/16/2013 7:10:50 PM PDT by AD from SpringBay (http://jonah2eight.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Great post from the web site. Reminds me of the rarely quoted verse, “if a man will not work, he shall not eat.”


7 posted on 08/16/2013 7:12:25 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
Bloomberg is a blooming fascist. Please tell him to get out of Colorado

Cuba or North Korea?

8 posted on 08/16/2013 7:13:15 PM PDT by Standing Wolf (No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Mr Bloomberg is quite the controller. New Yorkers must love him.


9 posted on 08/16/2013 7:13:20 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

10 posted on 08/16/2013 7:14:25 PM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Standing Wolf
Cuba or North Korea?

In Cuba or North Korea, if you don't work, you don't have a place to live, you don't eat, and so on. Public housing residents in NYC get free digs without having to work for it, unless having a pulse is considered working.

11 posted on 08/16/2013 7:18:26 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
Bloomberg is a blooming fascist. Please tell him to get out of Colorado

Actually, he is fairly conservative in the traditional sense of the word, which eschews laissez faire and libertinism in favor of societal curbs on errant individual behavior. Fascism requires that a people be united via bonds of blood and soil. That's a physical impossibility in multi-racial and -ethnic New York City. Ultimately, he's clamping down on black and Hispanic criminals in NYC while couching it in ethnically neutral terms.

12 posted on 08/16/2013 7:24:45 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Good idea, but ACLU will jump on this issue in favor of the criminal elements that inhabit public housing projects.


13 posted on 08/16/2013 7:32:10 PM PDT by mohresearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mohresearcher

“AND while you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct, since voting would be a conflict of interest. You will abstain from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then GET A JOB.”

If they want government assistance, they will also have to get a voter ID card.

That will explode the heads on the left.


14 posted on 08/16/2013 7:36:57 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
So are you willing to submit to all that in return for your Social Security check and Medicare coverage?

If govt. can require such intrusions for welfare, they can require them for govt.-funded retirement programs as well.

15 posted on 08/16/2013 7:53:33 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
Actually, he is fairly conservative in the traditional sense of the word, which eschews laissez faire and libertinismFREEDOM in favor of societal curbs on errant individual behavior.

Fixed it for you, Rudybot. ;)

16 posted on 08/16/2013 7:58:08 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (I remember when a President having an "enemies list" was a scandal. Now, they have a kill list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
AND have random, monthly drug tests for every recipient of government money.

Been tried in two states -- the welfare recipients had lower positives than the general population. And the tests cost more than the savings. Program dropped.

17 posted on 08/16/2013 7:58:46 PM PDT by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

600,000 people in NYC are living in public housing ???

How is this sustainable??


18 posted on 08/16/2013 7:59:20 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

And they are damn skippy correct...except for one part (IMHO): violation of ‘Rights’. It is not the gov’t $$, it is the TAXPAYER $$. That ‘charity’ comes from the end of a gun. Don’t like the new rules, tough sh!te.

LOVE the barracks idea. Good enough for your (wo)men, good enough for the brood mares and the like. BARE minimum and ‘free’ cleaning of parks, streets, rest stops, etc.

Yep, that last part’d get ‘em off ‘assistance’ damn quick


19 posted on 08/16/2013 8:00:53 PM PDT by i_robot73 (Gov't always start as MAY and SHOULD, but soon becomes one of WILL and SHALL. Never let them START.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

He can get their fingerprints offa discarded jumbo sodas.


20 posted on 08/16/2013 8:07:52 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

600,000 out of 8,000,000 is NOT 5%. It is more like 7.5% and in reality it is probably closer to 10% as the census department couldn’t count to eleven without taking off their shoes.


21 posted on 08/16/2013 8:11:21 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments

Bloomberg leading the charge to shove rhe maases into Agenda 21 U.N. style citizenship...


22 posted on 08/16/2013 8:13:44 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

If you live in public housing, then the government is paying your rent. And since you are relying on the government for your survival, then you have given them the right to run your life and tell you what to do. Deal with it, losers.


23 posted on 08/16/2013 8:31:00 PM PDT by jespasinthru (Proud member of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Exactly


24 posted on 08/16/2013 8:33:48 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

If you can’t or won’t protect yourself you do as you are told or die.


25 posted on 08/16/2013 8:52:47 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

600,000 people

un frickin believable


26 posted on 08/16/2013 8:55:12 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jespasinthru
If you live in public housing, then the government is paying your rent.

If you receive SS and Medicare, then the government is paying for your retirement.

And since you are relying on the government for your survival, then you have given them the right to run your life and tell you what to do.

Are you willing to say the same about SS and Medicare?

27 posted on 08/16/2013 8:55:23 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
NO PITY FOR THE LAZY!!!
28 posted on 08/16/2013 9:08:20 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

THIS, they complain about. Has Bloomie finally gone too far? I bet they will still vote for RATS all the way! /sarcasm


29 posted on 08/16/2013 9:08:50 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

I would have no problem with Social Security and Medicare requiring fingerprints. I had to be fingerprinted to work in the public safety field and didn’t mind a bit, because I knew it was required in order to work in that field, as it should be for any public employee or official. And because I’m not a criminal, I have nothing to worry about.

As far as I’m concerned, Bloomberg should also be requiring DNA, and anyone immigrating to this country legally or otherwise should be likewise required to comply. We have too much freedom for freeloaders, and not enough for people who take care of themselves and their families.


30 posted on 08/16/2013 9:21:28 PM PDT by Go_Raiders (Freedom doesn't give you the right to take from others, no matter how innocent your program sounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

That is - if there are any jobs to get. Have you forgotten - we are living in the Obama economy? I have much to say on your tyrannical point of view, but will refrain at this point in time.


31 posted on 08/16/2013 9:22:07 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay

Some recipients do buy food for their kids, so in essence, it will be the kids who go hungry. People need to stop and think before they pop off at the mouth about every issue.

Why not go after other issues where your tax money goes - such as foreign aid to countries who hate us? There are a list of them, yet people want to bi*** about food stamps - as if they want to control what others can and can’t do. Last time I checked that was the mantra of the left.

Yes, there is fraud with the food stamp program, but there is with every program - yet so many on here rant and rave over this. Could it be that you resent helping others who are less fortunate? If so, then you really aren’t compassionate people. We’ve never had a say where our tax dollars go and yet they go to Planned Parenthood as well.

In a utopic world, there would be plenty for everyone - jobs, food, houses, cars, etc, but we don’t live in a perfect world, do we? How many on here actually are willing to sustain a family of four with food for 3 or more years? Some of you may help out at Christmas time, but other than that - nada! People need to eat all year round. So go ahead and throw your rotten tomatoes at me - I’ve been in the trenches and have seen it all -and many families need the help they receive from the food stamps - and those I’ve met aren’t milking the system - they have lost their jobs - gone through a divorce and have kids to feed and clothe and keep a roof over their heads.

Over and out~


32 posted on 08/16/2013 9:29:04 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Notice Bloomberg’s words - who are you and why are you here? Isn’t that what George Zimmerman was trying to find out when he was so brutally attacked?


33 posted on 08/16/2013 9:30:32 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

lol, yep


34 posted on 08/16/2013 9:34:24 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

The difference is that people have paid into SS and Medicare - the government isn’t giving them anything they haven’t contributed to. The government gives a very poor return on the money put into these programs - where has the rest gone?

And people who have lost their jobs and now receiving food stamps have also paid into that program when they didn’t need it.

Such judgmental people on here - there might come a time when some of you who sit in your ivory towers and throw stones will find yourself in the same boat. No wonder people who are having a hard time don’t vote for conservatives. They are scared and from the posts I’ve read on this forum - they should be.

I worked for many years and paid into programs for others to receive food stamps and yet I didn’t mind. My taxes also support public housing, abortions and grants to study the mating habits of praying mantis’s. Yet, more people harp on food stamps than anything else. Just because you may see someone driving an expensive car when they leave the grocery doesn’t mean they didn’t have that car before they lost their job.


35 posted on 08/16/2013 9:35:56 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

People in the projects always blame the cops there is too much crime. But whenever a crime happens and the cops show up, the story they hear is “I dint see nuffins.”


36 posted on 08/16/2013 9:42:56 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (Still crazy after all these beers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
If govt. can require such intrusions for welfare, they can require them for govt.-funded retirement programs as well.

Earned, vs. unearned? I don't think so. Apples and oranges.

37 posted on 08/16/2013 9:50:32 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73
...good enough for the brood mares sows...
38 posted on 08/16/2013 9:52:57 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus
The difference is that people have paid into SS and Medicare - the government isn’t giving them anything they haven’t contributed to.

SS and Medicare are simply federal programs like myriad others created by Congress. It controls those purse strings just like NYC controls the purse strings of public housing.

If NYC has such authority, then Congress also has authority to impose conditions on beneficiaries of its programs.

39 posted on 08/16/2013 9:55:58 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
If you receive SS and Medicare, then the government is paying for your retirement.

For which you paid all your working life, and the government pissed away the funds in wasteful spending.

40 posted on 08/16/2013 9:56:19 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Earned, vs. unearned?

Congress can regulate SS with regards to age, benefit amounts, who is entitled to spousal benefits, etc, despite being "earned".

If Congress can do that with "earned" benefits, what's to stop them from imposing other regulations on recipients?

41 posted on 08/16/2013 10:03:09 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Stupid analogy. Public housing is voluntary whereas the other two are forced upon you.
42 posted on 08/16/2013 10:13:33 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Public housing is voluntary whereas the other two are forced upon you.

How does that matter with regard to governmental authority?

If Congress can force SS and Medicare on you, then what's to stop it from from imposing conditions on you in order to receive those benefits?

43 posted on 08/16/2013 10:33:34 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Your reasoning smacks of more government intrusion into people’s lives. You call yourself a conservative? If so, then I suggest you do some critical thinking before trying to impose more rules and regulations on people. If this is your stance, then you might be better off at DU or Huffington Post with those who want to rule over others and tell them how to live.


44 posted on 08/16/2013 10:39:18 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

To throw a little wood on the fire, all women who are getting ANY government money, Pell grants, section 8, WICS EBTS, small business loans, etc, should be required to get abortions if they get pregnant, or lose the benefits they already get!
If they could afford a child, then they obviously don’t need government aid.


45 posted on 08/16/2013 11:08:06 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus
Your reasoning smacks of more government intrusion into people’s lives.

That does not make sense. My reasoning just shows what follows when you cede more power to government.

If you support government authority to require people to give up basic constitutional rights to receive welfare, then you have no principled argument against similar intrusions in other programs that government created and regulates - like SS and Medicare.

I want to abolish all such programs not in keeping with the Constitution. Click on my name to see my outlook on such matters.

46 posted on 08/16/2013 11:12:05 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Clarification. Should read:

If you support government authority to require people to give up basic constitutional rights in order to receive welfare,

47 posted on 08/16/2013 11:15:35 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

LOL! Good one!


48 posted on 08/17/2013 3:57:56 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

not opposed to people getting food stamps to “feed their kids”

opposed to food stamps being used to buy junk food and other luxuries and being accepted at race tracks and the like

we all know that abuse is a problem, we have all seen it, and it is not hard to fix

a govt that can dictate what your kid gets served for lunch can dictate what healthy foods food stamps can buy. we can all break the code on moochelle Obama’s fixation on obesity - it aint rich white people


49 posted on 08/17/2013 4:03:15 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

What you want and what you’ll get are 2 different things. Let’s see now - how can provide for the general welfare +written in the Preamble and in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution be interpreted?

I’m just messing with you. Of course, these words don’t mean welfare, but try to convince low information voters of this fact. They hear the word welfare - and their lights go on.

This is a very deep subject and I’m not going to waste any more time on it. If people would help out others less fortunate on a daily basis - then perhaps there would be no need for government programs. But, alas - this isn’t the case. People hoard for themselves and that isn’t the Christian thing to do either. So when people aren’t charitable toward others - government steps in.

These programs - like them or not - aren’t going any where unless they go broke.


50 posted on 08/17/2013 4:14:17 AM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson