Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan Launches A Third Aircraft Carrier
Strategy Page ^ | August 14, 2013 | Strategy Page

Posted on 08/16/2013 10:23:59 AM PDT by ryan71

Japan launched a twenty-seven-thousand ton “destroyer” (the Izumo, DDH 183) on August 6th that looks exactly like an aircraft carrier. Actually it looks like an LPH (Landing Platform Helicopter) an amphibious ship type that first appeared in the 1950s. LPHs had no (or relatively few) landing craft but did carry a thousand or more troops who were moved ashore using the dozen or more helicopters carried. The first American LPH (the USS Iwo Jima) was an eighteen-thousand-four-hundred ton ship that entered service in 1961, and carried two-thousand troops and twenty-five helicopters. Until Izumo showed up, several nations operated LPHs, and Britain and South Korea still do. The U.S. retired its last LPHs in the 1990s, but still have a dozen similar ships that include landing craft (and a well deck in the rear to float them out of) as well as helicopters. A few other nations have small carriers that mostly operate helicopters but carry few, if any troops.

(Excerpt) Read more at strategypage.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carrier; ijn; japan; sdfn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/16/2013 10:23:59 AM PDT by ryan71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ryan71

TORA TORA TORA


2 posted on 08/16/2013 10:26:37 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71
The older USS Iwo Jima (LPH-2) was retired in 1993.

The current USS Iwo Jima (LHD-7) is still in service:


3 posted on 08/16/2013 10:34:30 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71
The Japanese are not going to sit back ilde as the Chinese Navy grows by leaps and bounds on their doorstep.

This is a large vessel. it's listeed at 27,000 tons full load and only able to carry 11 helicopters. But the telling compatrison is when you pit t in scale next to one of our own similar Amphibious Assault Helicopter Carreers (which can also carry up to 20 Hatrriers or later, 20 F-35B Joint Strike Fighters).

Out USS Wasp Class is 40,500 tons, and can carry over 30 helicopters and aircraft. Here's how the two look from the same perspective and at the same scal:

JMSDF IZUMO - US NAVY WASP COMPARISON

Clearly, this is a big ship with a lot more capability than is being indicated. And that's a good thing.

4 posted on 08/16/2013 10:34:47 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

If they build a B-29 we have problems.


5 posted on 08/16/2013 10:37:50 AM PDT by ZULU ((See: http://gatesofvienna.net/) Obama, do you hear me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

You gotta love the Japanese for their way with words.

“No, it’s not an aircraft carrier, it’s a destroyer with a flat deck and hangars for carrying aircraft, big difference!”


6 posted on 08/16/2013 10:38:13 AM PDT by MeganC (A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don't have one, you'll never need one again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

I see they put the island on the starboard side of the flight deck.


7 posted on 08/16/2013 10:40:17 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

“If they build a B-29 we have problems.”

lol! That one caught me off guard. Nice.


8 posted on 08/16/2013 10:41:04 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Can’t wait to see the proposed cruiser Yamato.


9 posted on 08/16/2013 10:41:33 AM PDT by Larry381 ("Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Just part of the Japanese cruise industry. 90% of the rooms have a balcony view.


10 posted on 08/16/2013 10:42:32 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry381

Especially with that new Wave-Motion gun !!!


11 posted on 08/16/2013 10:57:23 AM PDT by Salgak (http://catalogoftehburningstoopid.blogspot.com 100% all-natural snark !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Compared to European carriers....its a carrier.


12 posted on 08/16/2013 10:57:57 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

But but but can’t the Japanese just depend on obama to stand by them should the political winds turn in an ugly direction???


13 posted on 08/16/2013 11:02:44 AM PDT by null and void (Frequent terrorist attacks OR endless government snooping and oppression? We can have both!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

The Izumo class has far cleaner lines, and I bet a much smaller RCS.

On a radar I bet it looks a lot more like a smallish trawler than a warship.


14 posted on 08/16/2013 11:06:24 AM PDT by null and void (Frequent terrorist attacks OR endless government snooping and oppression? We can have both!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

IIRC, the largest warships allowed for Japan’s navy are destroyers. So they have quite a few varieties of “destroyers”!


15 posted on 08/16/2013 11:08:10 AM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Corrections:
1) The largest LPH’s were the three converted Essex-class carriers (Boxer, LPH-4; Princeton, LPH-5; and Valley Forge, LPH-8) all at 888.5’.
2) They were also the largest at 27,000 tons.


16 posted on 08/16/2013 11:08:44 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey

Displacement should be 40,600 - NOT 27,000 tons.


17 posted on 08/16/2013 11:11:06 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Japan has built submarines with a hanger deck in the past.


18 posted on 08/16/2013 11:17:53 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stylecouncilor

Gator Navy ping....


19 posted on 08/16/2013 11:21:08 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

And as for quality of workmanship

Made in Japan vs Made in China ?


20 posted on 08/16/2013 11:51:18 AM PDT by jcon40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson