Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Detroit Shows How Cities Can Shakedown Obamacare
Reason ^ | 08/07/2013 | Shikha Dalmia

Posted on 08/10/2013 12:55:17 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen

--snip-- Detroit is hardly the first city to think of having ObamaCare subsidize its retirees. Chicago, which is in financial difficulty but not bankruptcy, announced a similar plan even before Detroit. Other cities — some not even financially distressed — are contemplating doing the same thing.

And why not? ObamaCare imposes no penalties on governments that offload their retirees — in contrast to large employers who offload their active employees.

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: abortion; chapter9; deathpanels; detroit; michigan; obamacare; rosemaryaquillina; zerocare

1 posted on 08/10/2013 12:55:17 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

yeah...but they’re throwing a monkey wrench into the plan...too damned soon!

Obama wants to get some dough, cash, moolah, mo money mo money mo money, real dollars so he can dole out more largesse and influence....he don’t need no hangers-on cheap ass voters he’s already got. All that comes later under single payer when you’re in a government hospital coughing up a lung waiting on some political appointee to judge whether you deserve treatment (e.g., be you black, brown, yellow or [ewwww] white).


2 posted on 08/10/2013 1:05:28 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Yet another reason to resist paying. Let Obama try to collect.


3 posted on 08/10/2013 1:18:04 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

I’m surprised there aren’t more cities elbowing each other out to be first at the Obamacare trough.

If you don’t get there early, you’re not going to get anything. There’s not nearly enough money to cover the onslaught of people who will sign up for free or subsidized insurance. The pot is going to be drained dry very early on.

Democrats will try to go to the well to get more money and I hope that the GOP tells them to pound sand.


4 posted on 08/10/2013 2:02:06 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
Never has a poll shown majority support for Obamacare. If the GOP house cannot find the so-called courage to deny funding, . . . adios.
5 posted on 08/10/2013 2:12:31 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

The retirees are the ones being screwed. They will have to pay the premiums to the exchanges and for a 60 yo couple that could be $1,200-1,300 per month. This might also be a demographic that the insurance carriers don’t want to see.


6 posted on 08/10/2013 4:08:41 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Fight the culture of nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
The city will hand these young retirees an unspecified “monthly stipend” to help defray coverage costs — and still save some $27 to $40 million annually.

So the retirees will get a stipend for the premium AND a subsidy from the exchange? I guess the stipend would be considered income?

7 posted on 08/10/2013 4:21:54 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Fight the culture of nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson