Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Who do you foresee as emerging to lead the Republican Party?
dailypaul.com ^ | 08/06/13 | Paul 3V0L/O'Reilly Poll Results

Posted on 08/06/2013 12:28:29 AM PDT by entropy12

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: RginTN

I don’t blame you for changing the channel before Rove comes on. I switched, too. :)


61 posted on 08/06/2013 7:29:08 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Jeb Bush of course /s


62 posted on 08/06/2013 8:01:10 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been offically denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Yes that is him. I guess I should learn his appropriate name if I am going to brag about him. Thank you!


63 posted on 08/06/2013 8:31:32 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

64 posted on 08/06/2013 8:54:29 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Rand Paul thinks we should have a great military primarily geared for defense, that we should quit sending money to nations that hate us, we should help defend our allies, and nation building through war (Iraq) is not the right thing to do. Rand Paul thinks that if we have to go to war, we strike hard, using our power to defeat quickly rather than have a war designed to make defense contractors rich.


65 posted on 08/06/2013 10:13:41 AM PDT by entropy12 (Obama is now a lame duck, but with 2014 House majority, he will be dangerous socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Standing Wolf

Vichy Republican: Nixon was that; tried to out liberal Kennedy in 1960


66 posted on 08/06/2013 11:26:50 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Mitt and the grand poo-bahs have spoken: "It's Jebbie's turn!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

“You’re right. I went to http://www.billoreilly.com/ and proudly cast my vote for Someone Else ;-)”

So did I. I didn’t care much for the lineup.


67 posted on 08/06/2013 11:56:50 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ri4dc

The republican party needs a reckoning. It needs to decide is it truly a conservative party or the currently trending vichy, me-too I want to spend and grow just not as much as you, democrat lite party.

This reckoning needs to come to a head sooner rather than later for the countries sake. The traitorous vichy-gope must be tossed out currently the republican party is worth about as much as an opposition party as a puddle of goat piss in the barn yard.

Trouble is the vichy-gope control the levers of power and are not going anywhere anytime soon. We are screwed unless Palin, Cruz, Paul etc... stand up and walk out taking 90% of the conservative base with them.

I am not big on third parties but for conservatives to be successful in reckoning they have to replace the vichy-gope as the second party and kick it into the third party tier. It’s the countries only hope working within the republican party is not an option at this late point.


68 posted on 08/06/2013 12:30:46 PM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Bachmann? She backed Obama railing about Snowden being a Traitor? Then she went on the house flour and made a complete ass of herself on Amash’s amendment to defund the NSA domestic spying. She is as useless as any everyday GOPe like Peter King or Christie.

Santorum has no talent. He’s not a serious player.


69 posted on 08/06/2013 12:45:47 PM PDT by techworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Cruz or Paul, either one works for me.


70 posted on 08/06/2013 3:25:13 PM PDT by entropy12 (Obama is now a lame duck, but with 2014 House majority, he will be dangerous socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

What “Lead” implies is that he/she will not make decisions based on politics, but rather what is good for the country in the long run. Borrowing and over spending does work in next election but the country as a whole is going to the dogs.


71 posted on 08/06/2013 3:28:58 PM PDT by entropy12 (Obama is now a lame duck, but with 2014 House majority, he will be dangerous socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I can’t stand last 2 GOP nominee’s. McCain is a total jackass, and ROmney was way too mild mannered to confront the community organizer from Chicago machine. But then I will vote for a dog catcher over the community organizer or Hilda beast.


72 posted on 08/06/2013 3:31:31 PM PDT by entropy12 (Obama is now a lame duck, but with 2014 House majority, he will be dangerous socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Santorum has no charisma. He has weird facial expressions when confronted with a difficult question. Like it or not this is the age of 24-7 TV. Like it or not, your looks and personality means a lot to the low-information voters.

From my observation Cruz and Rand are the best in answering all gotcha questions with smoothness, aplomb and not having the deer in headlights look like Palin had in 2008. I would absolutely be thrilled to heaven if she becomes president buyt 50 years of observing politics tells me she can not win, unfortunately.


73 posted on 08/06/2013 3:38:24 PM PDT by entropy12 (Obama is now a lame duck, but with 2014 House majority, he will be dangerous socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Could be because Cruz and Palin have not declared interest in running in 2016. Cruz has made tangential comments, Palin none.


74 posted on 08/06/2013 3:40:01 PM PDT by entropy12 (Obama is now a lame duck, but with 2014 House majority, he will be dangerous socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: xzins

You got that right. With one moderate versus many semi-conservatives, Romney won easily.


75 posted on 08/06/2013 3:41:04 PM PDT by entropy12 (Obama is now a lame duck, but with 2014 House majority, he will be dangerous socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
'Coulter that flip flops worse than Kerry? Please spare me....'

HUH? Only people who can't keep up with her don't like our Princess Ann.

She's the greatest conservative we got goin! Straightforward, honest brutal AND a genius Lib Raker. Graduated Cornell summa and Michigan Univ. Law Review n'...HOLD ON.....authored 8 or maybe 9...yep ....it's 9 alright.... CONSERVATIVE BESTSELLERS. She's been in there forever fightin' tooth and nail against the Immigration Mess,to. She's been all over the media ...on hannity a boatload of times ... 6 out of 10 of her columns destroyed any possible credibilty the IMMIGRATION movement might have had....

Another thing UNLIKE THE REST OF EVEN THE CONSERVATIVE MEDIA ANN IS COMPLETELY FEARLESS.... Regarding the Zimmerman media travesty. WHO BUT Ann made us aware completely of the instances of break ins at Zimmy's condo....and pointed out that the perps were black teens?.....Hannity and Oreilly never did...they SHOULD have delineated EVERY one of them putting each up on the screens of their shows.. in a clear GRAPHIC. One that never appeared, at ALL. How is that a 95 lb BRAINY BEAUTY could find and report these facts and Fox with it's powerful research arm either did not find them or did not broadcast the graphic.....unafraid huh....? Only ANN did that... ONLY ANN! HERE'S THE URL .... Start with paragraph read 6 thru 15 ..

,GET TO WORK!

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2013-07-10.html

COME BACK, LAD, WHEN YOU'VE GOT A LAW DEGREE AND AUTHORED 9 CONSERVATIVE BEST SELLERS...!




76 posted on 08/06/2013 4:13:08 PM PDT by jimsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

You make some fine points. I suppose we are going to end up with Christie and then lose again to whatever Democrat they chose. Such a shame.


77 posted on 08/06/2013 4:13:38 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jimsin

Come back when miss law degree explains pimping Christie and Romney after slagging everything they stood for and actually did for several best sellers.

Or do you have a mental block going about that extremely unconservative reality?


78 posted on 08/06/2013 4:15:50 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: jimsin

Unfortunately, Ann Coulter screws the pooch when it comes to presidential elections.

She’s done a good job fighting Rubio and amnesty, however.


79 posted on 08/06/2013 4:20:48 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Yep, it’ll take him a while to get traction, but when Christie gets momentum he’ll be really hard to stop. Your run-of-the-mill safety net just ain’t gonna cut it.


80 posted on 08/06/2013 4:28:04 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson