Skip to comments.Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals
Posted on 08/02/2013 9:11:28 PM PDT by coldphoenix
Using the same tactics used by gay rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.
Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an alternative lifestyle or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits. Gay advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at greeleygazette.com ...
Next will be the beastialists, if there is such a word. Cue Donny Osmond “Puppy Love”.
One could take Elvis’ version of ‘Your Teddy Bear’ and change it to ‘Your Pedo Bear’. That would ruin it forever.
If this ever comes about I predict a 6/day bag limit with minimum caliber required to be either 9mm,.223, or 00 buck.
Yea. Touch my child and die. You can plead your rights in the court of St. Peter ,regardless of the the legality.
The majority of the Supreme Court, for starters.
Pedophiles want to marry each other????
Well, it’s not too much a stretch for a pedophile to want to marry a child. Certain liberals want to get rid of age of consent laws, or lower such ages to low limits such as 12 years of age. Not too much of a stretch for a pedophile to marry a 12 year old girl if it was legal. And then, by definition, legally he can do whatever he wants to her.
Who could have thought!
did you see the story of the Pakistan TV Cleric giving away baby girls as prizes to viewers?? (I think we know they are brides)
They want to marry each other?
I am all for this. Pedophiles should be treated the same as gays. They are self determining individuals. Right? Right.
But as soon as they touch a child, who, by all accounts both professional and anecdotal, are physically, emotionally, and mentally incapable of making this type of decision we get to run over said pedophiles with our lawn mowers. Repeat. Rinse. Right? Right.
Those of use lacking the requisite attitude of enlightened acceptance and affirmation will be shunned as social outcasts; labeled as bigots and pedophobes.
Justice is the balancing of rights.
How to balance the newly proclaimed “rights” of pedophiles and the rights of the parents of the children with which the pedophiles want to establish a relationship the parents do not want to occur?
Traditionally, the parents and a few friends paid a visit to Mr. Pedophile and when Mr. could walk again he left town. Often, the ‘tenderized’ Mr. Pedophile was placed on a vehicle leaving town.
With the advent of an over-reaching judiciary, and a host of trough feeders, the situation is now so out of control that the insane have not just taken over the asylum, they are presented as respected minorities according to Lame Stream Media and of course the academented.
Oh, by the way, who or what follows the long list of sexual perverts? What’s further down the slope?
Isn’t that speaaaachal.
Could anyone honestly say...they never seen this coming.
Phil Donahue (TV talk show) was introducing America to NAMBLA spokemen in the second half of the 1980s.
It was a an introduction to mainstreaming them.
“On February 5, 1987, Bernard appeared as a guest on the Phil Donahue show and advocated pedophile activism, accompanied by a 23-year-old male who had allegedly been involved in a sexual relationship with an adult as a child.”
Libertarians are aware of the issue as well.
Time magazine May 21, 2008
“”The fracas started with Mary J. Ruwart, the candidate with perhaps the deepest, purest libertarian roots (her rejection of government is so complete that some party moderates have begun warning of the anarchical dangers of “Ruwarchy”). In April, a rival called her out for her thoughts in a 1999 book called Short Answers to the Tough Questions. “Children who willingly participate in sexual acts have the right to make that decision as well, even if it’s distasteful to us personally,” Ruwart wrote. “When we outlaw child pornography, the prices paid for child performers rise, increasing the incentives for parents to use children against their will.”
Ruwart’s is a classic libertarian take a defense of free will (even for “child performers”) and an attack on government prohibitions of any kind. It’s also political poison. As libertarian blogger Steve Newton put it, Ruwart and her allies run the risk of turning the party into “the poster child for NAMBLA and the aluminum hat brigade.”
The party’s executive director, Shane Cory, saw the danger as well, and rushed out a press release titled, “Libertarians call for increased communication to combat child pornography.” Cory was attacked by hardliners who saw the release as an endorsement of increased federal prosecuting power. The party refused to vote on a resolution asking states to strongly enforce existing child porn laws. Cory resigned in protest, depriving a party in the midst of what may be its most promising election season of one of its most able organizers and fund raisers. But for many libertarian faithful, adherence to the most rigid of principles always trumps practical considerations about how those principles might be more broadly observed.””
Regarding pedophilia, Liberals are conservatives with their proposals of an age of consent at 12 - Muslim “Law” allows marriage at nine.
MadMo married Alisha when she was 6 and ‘consummated” teh marriage when she was 9.
Muslims hold that MadMo was the perfect man.
And remember, “Diversity is our strength.”
Or was that, “Perversity is our strength.”
Look up the scientific (not political!) term for homosexuality, which, shockingly, is not ‘gaiety’, as you all thought, but ‘pederasty’, and see the word’s two meanings.
If this demented crap becomes mainstreamed, I predict a nationwide public health emergency from all the decomposing dead pedophiles littering our neighborhoods and waterways.
Oh, yeah, and I dare a jury to convict on any incident contributing to the public health hazard.
This would make great ammunition against gay rights but Dems will keep pedos in the closet for obvious reasons.
The author mostly cites the principles and arguments used to promote gay rights and how they could apply to pedos. This is accurate. Gay rights arguments are intellectually shallow and very vaguely stated.
However Dems wont walk into that trap and propose such laws, We should pray they try.
They are much smarter than those fool Republicans who walked into Obama’s Birth Control trap last year, They want to win to get power.
That’s OK, I’ll just think of them as adultophobes, as I watch them crumple under the front of my oncoming car.
I’m surprised there were any takers, seeing as how they were girls, and it’s Pakistan.
They wanted to push it under the rug like the homo pride movement tried to do. Bad PR. Not that it changed the reality.
"Hello, dear, how was your day?"
little jeremiah, I don’t mean to bother you by pinging you to a thread that you aren’t on, but I think that you asked to see what is in post 20.
The somewhat mixed signals, Radio talk show host, Michael Savage, was also a close friend of Allen Ginsberg, the prominent lefty poet and NAMBLA figure.
“Ginsberg also spoke out in defense of the freedom of expression of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). In “Thoughts on NAMBLA”, a 1994 essay published in the collection Deliberate Prose, Ginsberg stated, “I joined NAMBLA in defense of free speech.” In the essay, he referred to NAMBLA “as a forum for reform of those laws on youthful sexuality which members deem oppressive, a discussion society not a sex club.” Ginsberg expressed the opinion that the appreciation of youthful bodies and “the human form divine” has been a common theme throughout the history of culture, “from Rome’s Vatican to Florence’s Uffizi galleries to New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art”, and that laws regarding the issue needed to be more openly discussed.”
As Tim "The Toolman" Tayor would say: "More power!"
All part of The Plan. Watch the movie “Agenda.”
One of these things touches my boy, they are as good as dead. It’s as simple as that.
It’ll be fun watching liberals be forced to defend this because of their pro-gay agenda.. Hehehe.
Pedophiles now want to marry each other? That’s weird.
no bag limit, take care of it till there ain’t anymore problem left.
They will just say the homo stuff is between consenting adults, as would most people, regardless of political, uh, orientation.
Yeah! Let’s get poor Jerry Sandusky out of jail! /very heavy sarcasm
I appreciate the ping, will read tomorrow, crawling to bed now. I’m so busy and there is so much bad news I haven’t pinged out my lists very much lately. So I always am grateful if people alert me to relevant threads.
ACK!!! I didn’t know Savage was a friend of Allen Ginsberg the vile monster pervert!
Slopes really are slippery!
Nope. Pederasty means essentially "boy lover," and is thus a sub-group of homosexuality. The traditional pederast was an ephobophile (lover of post-pubescent boys), not a pedophile (pre-pubescent).
Technically, an ephebophile or pedophile as such can go after either sex, but a pederast is limited to boys. I'm not sure, but technically I also don't think a female can be a pederast.
Interesting factoid. Prior to the Progressive Era of the late 19th century, in most jurisdictions the age of consent was either 10 or 12 years of age.
Get a pick-up and install one of those moose whacker bumper assemblies.Save a lot of money on bodywork.
Necrophiles will be offered a shot at fresh corpses, too. It’s only fair!
Nope, one of the meanings of the word pederasty has always been, in the science field, ‘homosexuality’. The two meanings are still in the dictionary. It is only the science of political correctness that’s convinced some that pederasty = pedophilia.
Been too busy to ping.
This is a must ping.