Posted on 07/26/2013 12:24:09 AM PDT by neverdem
Hi. Do you still have a copy of this. Where can I find the FORTRAN code written by Mann?
It would be great to see this. There are lots of folks on FR who understand FORTRAN, C, Objective C, Java, all sorts of stuff really.
It would be great to see Mann’s code.
As I indicated, in the motion stage before plenary hearing the burden for the plaintiff is only to express or articulate a legal case, to put it into jargon, to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The defendants came in and said, (I am presuming here because the report that were discussing is so bad) yes I said it, but it's true. The plaintiff then says, "no it ain't." The judge says, I can't tell from the papers whether it's true or not, we need to have a regular hearing, with real witnesses and real evidence.
This result is no surprise but the usual course in most of these motions and it simply means that the case moves on to trial. It does not mean that defendant has met any burden, it does not mean that the plaintiff has met any burden apart from articulating a case which, if true, means the plaintiff would prevail. The court makes no conclusion about whether the plaintiff's case is true or the defendant's defense is true. It merely assumes truth of the plaintiff's case for the purposes of applying the law and withdraws that assumption as the matter moves onto trial when the court puts the parties to their proofs.
The legalese is necessary as a shorthand to avoid paragraph after paragraph of explanations to avoid false impressions.
Article about Mark Steyn ping.
Freepmail me, if you want on or off the Mark Steyn ping list.
Thanks for the ping Slings and Arrows.
Well-said, sir.
Did you see her ratings when you searched the name? I did. My eyes are rolling to the next continent. Average rating: 1 of a scale of 1-10.
That’s the Judicial equivalent of Bluto’s GPA in Animal House.
http://www.livescience.com/17151-climategate-emails-michael-mann.html
You will notice that Micheal Mann is the one complaining the most about the security breach.
Then his comments in the code will kill him in court. If the data is lost, then it is not data, replacing it with numbers you wish is not research, its fiction.
Good, Mark should tear him a new one and it will be a good thing for mankind.
Thank you for your explanation, without it I would have completely missed what actually happened. Posters like you are the reason I love Free Republic.
I found another link that lets you download a pdf file of a bunch of the emails.
http://www.lavoisier.com.au/articles/greenhouse-science/climate-change/climategate-emails.pdf
Micheal Mann is indeed a total fraud. He and his agenda driven cohorts should be in jail.
6. All of the atoms and molecules that make up the earth and its atmosphere travel around that sun, at an amazing speed, spinning at the same time. And we don’t lose an atom or a molecule. How can that be???
Gravity.
There is nothing new under the sun.
I don't really know how much is the same, and have no idea if some of the same players are involved, but it this story did remind me of that earlier work. However, I have experienced that some of the worst players in other schemes will stick to what they got away with before. Like it was a kind of dare to the rest of us; an "in your face."
Thanks neverdem.
Precisely, and mother earth is more in control of everything in, on and around it, than any East Anglia prof.
I saw that “judge” in the movie Idiocracy
The article refers to Combs-Greene as a “U.S.District Court judge” which she is not(Para 5). She is a D.C. Superior Court judge as the “Final Note” states. Those are two entirely different judicial systems, one federal, the other “state” although the District of Columbia is not a ‘state.’
She IS a wretched judge in any case. Good luck finding a non-liberal judge in that court.
The criticisms in the Robing Room are quite accurate, speaking from experience.
It is not clear that the judge gave the defendants an opportunitiy to raise the issue. She seems to have jumped the gun before they could respond.
Since “down” in our solar system is towards the sun, how can anything be “under the sun?” :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.